CVE-2007-5209 in DriveLock
Summary
by MITRE
Stack-based buffer overflow in DriveLock.exe in CenterTools DriveLock 5.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP request to TCP port 6061. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/27/2019
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2007-5209 represents a critical stack-based buffer overflow flaw in CenterTools DriveLock 5.0 software, specifically within the DriveLock.exe component. This vulnerability exposes a fundamental security weakness in the software's handling of network requests, particularly those directed to TCP port 6061 which serves as the primary communication channel for the DriveLock service. The flaw arises from inadequate input validation mechanisms that fail to properly sanitize or limit the length of incoming HTTP requests, creating an exploitable condition that can be remotely leveraged by malicious actors.
The technical nature of this vulnerability aligns with CWE-121, which describes stack-based buffer overflow conditions where insufficient bounds checking allows attackers to overwrite adjacent memory locations on the stack. When a remote attacker crafts a malicious HTTP request containing excessive data payload to the designated TCP port 6061, the DriveLock.exe process fails to validate the request length, causing the buffer to overflow and potentially overwrite critical stack memory regions including return addresses and function pointers. This memory corruption can be carefully manipulated to redirect program execution flow to attacker-controlled code, thereby enabling arbitrary code execution on the affected system.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple privilege escalation as it provides remote attackers with complete system compromise capabilities. The attack vector does not require local system access or authentication, making it particularly dangerous as it can be exploited from any network location without prior credentials. Once successful, the exploit allows attackers to execute malicious code with the privileges of the DriveLock service account, which typically operates with elevated system permissions. This creates a pathway for attackers to gain persistent access, install backdoors, exfiltrate sensitive data, or establish further footholds within network environments where DriveLock is deployed.
From a threat modeling perspective, this vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of input validation and proper memory management in security-critical applications. The ATT&CK framework categorizes this type of vulnerability under T1059.007 for Windows Command and Scripting Interpreter and T1203 for Exploitation for Client Execution, highlighting how such flaws enable attackers to execute malicious payloads. Organizations running CenterTools DriveLock 5.0 are particularly vulnerable as this represents a zero-day exploit opportunity that can be immediately leveraged by threat actors without requiring advanced reconnaissance or specialized tools. The vulnerability's remote exploitability and code execution capabilities make it a high-priority target for cybercriminals seeking to compromise systems and establish persistent access.
The recommended mitigation strategies include immediate deployment of vendor patches or updates to address the buffer overflow condition in DriveLock.exe, implementing network segmentation to restrict access to TCP port 6061, and applying firewall rules to limit external access to the service. Organizations should also consider disabling the DriveLock service if not actively required, as this eliminates the attack surface entirely. Additionally, network monitoring should be enhanced to detect anomalous HTTP request patterns that might indicate exploitation attempts, and regular security assessments should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities in other network services and applications. The vulnerability serves as a reminder of the critical need for robust input validation and memory safety practices in software development, particularly for applications that handle network communications and operate with elevated privileges.