CVE-2008-1088 in Project
Summary
by MITRE
Microsoft Project 2000 Service Release 1, 2002 SP1, and 2003 SP2 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Project file, related to improper validation of "memory resource allocations."
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/01/2025
Microsoft Project versions 2000 Service Release 1, 2002 Service Pack 1, and 2003 Service Pack 2 contain a critical vulnerability that stems from inadequate validation of memory resource allocations within project file processing mechanisms. This vulnerability falls under the Common Weakness Enumeration category CWE-125, which identifies improper validation of memory resource allocations as a significant security flaw. The flaw manifests when the application processes specially crafted project files that contain malformed memory allocation requests, creating conditions where attackers can manipulate the memory management subsystem to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability occurs through user-assisted remote attack vectors where an attacker crafts a malicious project file designed to trigger buffer overflows or memory corruption during the parsing process. When a user opens the malicious file, the application's insufficient input validation allows the attacker-controlled data to overwrite adjacent memory locations, potentially leading to code execution with the privileges of the affected user. This vulnerability represents a classic stack-based buffer overflow scenario where the application fails to properly validate the size and content of memory allocations before processing project file data structures.
The operational impact of CVE-2008-1088 extends beyond simple code execution as it provides attackers with a pathway to establish persistent access to corporate networks where Microsoft Project is commonly used for project management and scheduling tasks. Organizations utilizing these older versions of Microsoft Project face significant risk since the vulnerability can be exploited through social engineering tactics, where users are tricked into opening malicious project files via email attachments or shared network drives. The attack surface is particularly concerning in enterprise environments where project files are frequently shared between team members and departments, creating multiple potential entry points for exploitation.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability require immediate patching of affected Microsoft Project versions through official Microsoft security updates, as the company released specific fixes addressing the memory allocation validation issues. Organizations should also implement strict file validation policies that prevent users from opening project files from untrusted sources, combined with network-level controls that block suspicious file transfers. The vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1059.007, which covers the execution of malicious code through application invocation, and T1203, which involves the exploitation of software vulnerabilities for remote code execution. Additionally, system administrators should consider implementing application whitelisting policies that restrict execution of unauthorized project files and deploy intrusion detection systems to monitor for suspicious file processing activities that may indicate exploitation attempts.