CVE-2009-0111 in Goople CMS
Summary
by MITRE
SQL injection vulnerability in frontpage.php in Goople CMS 1.8.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the username parameter.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/21/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2009-0111 represents a critical SQL injection flaw within the Goople CMS version 1.8.2 and earlier releases. This security weakness resides in the frontpage.php script which processes user authentication requests. The vulnerability stems from inadequate input validation and sanitization mechanisms that fail to properly escape or filter user-supplied data before incorporating it into database queries. Attackers can exploit this weakness by manipulating the username parameter to inject malicious SQL code that bypasses normal authentication procedures.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability aligns with CWE-89, which specifically addresses SQL injection flaws in software applications. The flaw occurs when user input flows directly into SQL command construction without proper sanitization or parameterization. In the context of Goople CMS, when a user attempts to log in, the username parameter is directly concatenated into a SQL query string without appropriate escaping mechanisms. This creates an environment where an attacker can inject SQL syntax that alters the intended query execution flow, potentially allowing unauthorized database access, data manipulation, or even complete system compromise.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple authentication bypass scenarios. Remote attackers can leverage this weakness to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database server, potentially gaining access to sensitive user credentials, personal information, and other confidential data stored within the CMS database. The vulnerability enables attackers to perform data extraction, modification, or deletion operations that could result in significant data loss or system integrity compromise. Additionally, this flaw can serve as a stepping stone for further attacks within the network infrastructure, as database access often provides attackers with elevated privileges and additional attack vectors.
The attack vector for CVE-2009-0111 operates through standard web application interfaces, requiring no special privileges or access methods. Attackers can craft malicious requests containing SQL injection payloads in the username parameter, which are then processed by the vulnerable CMS application. This vulnerability operates at the application layer and can be exploited through various means including direct web browser manipulation, automated scanning tools, or custom attack scripts designed to test for SQL injection weaknesses. The exploitation process typically involves crafting SQL injection payloads that can manipulate the authentication logic to either bypass authentication entirely or gain access to administrative functions within the CMS.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on implementing proper input validation and parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection attacks. Organizations should immediately upgrade to Goople CMS versions that address this vulnerability, as version 1.8.3 and later releases contain appropriate fixes for the SQL injection flaw. The implementation of prepared statements or parameterized queries should replace direct string concatenation in database operations, ensuring that user input is properly escaped and treated as data rather than executable code. Additionally, comprehensive input validation should be implemented to filter out potentially malicious characters and patterns that could be used in SQL injection attacks. Network-based protections such as web application firewalls and intrusion detection systems can provide additional layers of defense, though these should not replace proper code-level fixes. Regular security audits and code reviews should be conducted to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities in other components of the application stack, following established security frameworks and best practices from organizations such as owasp and nist.