CVE-2010-3924 in Aipo
Summary
by MITRE
SQL injection vulnerability in Aimluck Aipo before 5.1.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/08/2019
The CVE-2010-3924 vulnerability represents a critical sql injection flaw discovered in Aimluck Aipo versions prior to 5.1.0.1, a collaborative software platform designed for enterprise communication and workflow management. This vulnerability specifically affects the authentication mechanism of the application, allowing authenticated users to exploit the system through unspecified attack vectors that bypass normal security controls. The vulnerability falls under the category of CWE-89 sql injection as defined by the common weakness enumeration framework, which classifies it as a direct injection flaw where untrusted data is incorporated into sql commands without proper sanitization or parameterization. The attack surface is particularly concerning because it requires only authenticated access, meaning that an attacker who has already gained legitimate user credentials can leverage this vulnerability to escalate their privileges and execute arbitrary database commands.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation and sanitization within the application's sql query construction processes. When authenticated users submit data through various application interfaces, the system fails to properly escape or parameterize user-supplied inputs before incorporating them into database queries. This allows maliciously crafted input to alter the intended sql command structure, potentially enabling attackers to extract sensitive data, modify database records, or even execute administrative commands on the underlying database system. The unspecified vectors suggest that multiple entry points within the application may be susceptible to this injection attack, making the vulnerability particularly dangerous as it could be exploited through various user interactions and application functions. The vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1071.004 application layer protocol manipulation, as it exploits the application's handling of user inputs to manipulate underlying database operations.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data theft, as it provides attackers with the capability to perform extensive database manipulation and potentially compromise the entire application infrastructure. An attacker with authenticated access could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges, access restricted administrative functions, or extract confidential information from the database including user credentials, personal data, and business-sensitive information. The vulnerability's presence in a collaborative platform like Aipo means that the potential for damage is amplified, as attackers could compromise not just individual user accounts but entire organizational communication channels and workflow processes. Organizations using affected versions face significant risk of data breaches, compliance violations, and potential regulatory penalties due to the exposure of sensitive information through unauthorized database access. The vulnerability also creates opportunities for attackers to establish persistent access through database-level backdoors or to perform lateral movement within the network infrastructure that relies on the compromised application.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2010-3924 primarily focus on immediate application patching to version 5.1.0.1 or later, which incorporates proper input validation and sql injection prevention measures. Organizations should implement comprehensive input sanitization procedures, including parameterized queries and prepared statements, to prevent user inputs from being interpreted as sql commands. Network segmentation and access controls should be strengthened to limit the potential impact of authenticated attacks, while comprehensive logging and monitoring should be implemented to detect unusual database access patterns. Security awareness training for administrators and users can help prevent initial compromise through social engineering or credential theft. The vulnerability also underscores the importance of regular security assessments and penetration testing to identify similar injection flaws in other applications and systems. Organizations should consider implementing web application firewalls and database activity monitoring solutions to provide additional layers of protection against sql injection attacks and to ensure compliance with industry standards such as pci dss and iso 27001 requirements for secure application development and deployment practices.