CVE-2012-2021 in AssetManager
Summary
by MITRE
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in HP AssetManager 5.20, 5.21, 5.22, and 9.30 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/18/2019
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2012-2021 represents a critical security flaw in HP AssetManager versions 5.20, 5.21, 5.22, and 9.30 that exposes organizations to significant cross-site scripting attacks. This vulnerability falls under the CWE-79 category of Cross-Site Scripting, which is classified as a fundamental web application security weakness that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. The vulnerability specifically affects the authentication mechanisms of the HP AssetManager platform, enabling authenticated users to exploit the system through unspecified vectors that permit arbitrary web script or HTML injection. The presence of multiple affected versions indicates this was a widespread issue that required immediate attention from organizations utilizing these specific HP AssetManager releases.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation and output encoding within the HP AssetManager application's web interface. When authenticated users submit data through various application forms or interfaces, the system fails to properly sanitize or escape user-supplied input before rendering it in web responses. This weakness creates an environment where malicious scripts can be executed within the context of other users' browsers, potentially allowing attackers to steal session cookies, perform unauthorized actions, or redirect users to malicious websites. The unspecified vectors suggest that multiple entry points within the application could be exploited, including form fields, URL parameters, or API endpoints that handle user input. This broad attack surface increases the likelihood of successful exploitation and makes the vulnerability particularly dangerous for enterprise environments where HP AssetManager is used for critical asset management operations.
The operational impact of CVE-2012-2021 extends beyond simple script injection, as it fundamentally compromises the integrity and confidentiality of the asset management system. Organizations utilizing affected HP AssetManager versions face potential data breaches, unauthorized access to sensitive asset information, and possible lateral movement within their network infrastructure. The authenticated nature of the vulnerability means that attackers must first establish valid credentials, but once inside the system, they can leverage this weakness to escalate their privileges or exfiltrate data. This vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1059.007 for Command and Scripting Interpreter, where attackers can use the XSS capability to execute malicious scripts. The implications are particularly severe for asset management systems that store sensitive organizational data including hardware inventory, software licenses, and financial asset information, as the compromised system could serve as a foothold for more extensive attacks.
Organizations should implement immediate mitigations including applying the latest security patches from HP, which would address the input validation gaps in the affected versions. Network segmentation and web application firewalls can provide additional layers of protection by monitoring and filtering suspicious traffic patterns that may indicate XSS attempts. Input validation should be strengthened through comprehensive sanitization of all user-supplied data, with special attention to HTML encoding of output displayed to users. The principle of least privilege should be enforced by ensuring that users only have access to the specific functions necessary for their roles, reducing the potential impact of successful exploitation. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should be conducted to identify similar vulnerabilities in other applications and systems within the organization's infrastructure. The vulnerability serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining up-to-date security patches and implementing robust security controls in enterprise asset management systems, particularly those handling sensitive organizational data.