CVE-2012-6508 in Car Portal
Summary
by MITRE
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in NetArt Media Car Portal 3.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change arbitrary user passwords via a nouveau action in the security module to cars/ADMIN/index.php; (2) create a user or (3) create a sub user via a sub_accounts action in the home module to USERS/index.php; or (4) change profile information via an edit action in the profile module to USERS/index.php.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/26/2024
The CVE-2012-6508 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site request forgery flaw in NetArt Media Car Portal version 3.0 that exposes administrative functions to unauthorized manipulation. This vulnerability falls under the CWE-352 category of Cross-Site Request Forgery, where attackers can exploit the lack of proper authentication verification mechanisms to execute malicious actions on behalf of authenticated administrators. The vulnerability specifically affects the administrative interface of the car portal system, creating a pathway for remote attackers to compromise system integrity and user data through carefully crafted malicious requests.
The technical implementation of this CSRF vulnerability stems from the absence of anti-CSRF tokens or proper session validation mechanisms in several administrative endpoints. Attackers can leverage this flaw to perform four distinct malicious operations without requiring valid credentials or session tokens. The first attack vector targets the security module where a nouveau action in cars/ADMIN/index.php allows password changes for arbitrary user accounts. The second and third vectors operate through the home module with sub_accounts action in USERS/index.php, enabling attackers to create new user accounts or establish sub-user accounts. The fourth vector targets the profile module through an edit action in USERS/index.php, allowing modification of existing user profile information.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple unauthorized access, as it provides attackers with administrative privileges to manipulate user accounts and system configurations. Successful exploitation could result in complete compromise of the administrative interface, enabling attackers to modify user credentials, create persistent backdoor accounts, alter user permissions, and potentially access sensitive customer data. The vulnerability's remote nature means attackers do not need physical access to the system or knowledge of valid credentials to exploit these weaknesses, making it particularly dangerous for web applications that handle sensitive user information.
Security professionals should recognize this vulnerability as a classic example of insufficient anti-CSRF protection mechanisms in web applications, aligning with common ATT&CK techniques for privilege escalation and credential access. The vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of implementing proper token-based validation for all administrative functions and user account management operations. Organizations should immediately implement CSRF protection measures including unique tokens for each user session, proper referer header validation, and SameSite cookie attributes to prevent such attacks. Additionally, regular security assessments and input validation reviews should be conducted to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities in web applications, particularly those handling sensitive administrative functions and user account management operations.
The affected system components include the administrative modules in the cars/ADMIN/index.php file, the user management functionality in USERS/index.php, and the profile editing capabilities within the USERS module. These interfaces lack proper state validation and authentication checks that would normally verify the legitimacy of requests originating from authenticated administrators. The vulnerability's persistence across multiple functional modules indicates a systemic flaw in the application's security architecture rather than isolated implementation errors, requiring comprehensive remediation across all affected endpoints to ensure complete protection against CSRF attacks and unauthorized administrative access.