CVE-2013-4844 in Service Manager
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in HP Service Manager 7.11, 9.21, 9.30, 9.31, and 9.32, and ServiceCenter 6.2.8, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/20/2018
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2013-4844 represents a critical security flaw affecting multiple versions of HP Service Manager and ServiceCenter platforms. This unspecified vulnerability exists within HP Service Manager versions 7.11, 9.21, 9.30, 9.31, and 9.32, as well as ServiceCenter version 6.2.8, creating a significant attack surface for remote threat actors. The vulnerability's classification as unspecified indicates that the exact technical details of the flaw were not publicly disclosed at the time of reporting, making it particularly dangerous as security teams cannot immediately assess the precise nature of the exploit vector. This lack of transparency in vulnerability disclosure is consistent with the Common Weakness Enumeration classification for unspecified vulnerabilities which typically fall under CWE-1004, representing weaknesses that are not yet fully understood or documented.
The core technical flaw within these HP service management platforms allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems without requiring authentication or specific credentials. This capability represents a severe privilege escalation vulnerability that can be exploited through unknown attack vectors, making it extremely challenging for organizations to defend against. The unspecified nature of the attack vector suggests that the vulnerability may involve multiple potential exploitation methods including but not limited to buffer overflows, injection attacks, or improper input validation mechanisms. The remote execution capability places this vulnerability in the ATT&CK framework under the T1059 category for Command and Scripting Interpreter, while also potentially mapping to T1203 for Exploitation for Client Execution, as attackers can leverage this flaw to gain persistent access to enterprise environments.
The operational impact of CVE-2013-4844 is substantial for organizations utilizing affected HP platforms, as successful exploitation can lead to complete system compromise, data exfiltration, and potential lateral movement within network infrastructure. Service management platforms typically serve as critical enterprise tools for IT operations, making them attractive targets for attackers seeking to establish persistent footholds within organizational networks. The vulnerability's presence in multiple versions suggests a widespread impact across different HP service management deployments, potentially affecting thousands of enterprise environments. Organizations running these platforms face risks including unauthorized access to sensitive service management data, disruption of critical IT operations, and potential escalation to broader network compromise. The vulnerability's remote exploitability means that attackers can target these systems from outside the corporate network, significantly expanding the potential attack surface and reducing the effectiveness of traditional network perimeter defenses.
Mitigation strategies for CVE-2013-4844 require immediate attention from affected organizations, beginning with the implementation of network segmentation to isolate critical service management systems from general network access. Organizations should implement network monitoring and intrusion detection systems to identify potential exploitation attempts, particularly focusing on unusual outbound connections or unexpected system behavior. The most effective long-term solution involves applying official security patches released by HP to address the unspecified vulnerability, though organizations should verify patch compatibility with their existing infrastructure before deployment. Security teams should also conduct comprehensive vulnerability assessments to identify any additional unpatched systems within their environment that may be running similar HP service management software. Access controls should be strengthened through mandatory authentication, privilege least privilege principles, and regular security audits of service management configurations. Organizations should also consider implementing application whitelisting and endpoint protection solutions to prevent unauthorized code execution on affected systems, while maintaining regular security awareness training for administrators who manage these critical platforms.