CVE-2014-2992 in Misli.com app
Summary
by MITRE
The Misli.com application for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/12/2026
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2014-2992 represents a critical security flaw in the Misli.com Android application that fundamentally undermines the integrity of secure communications between mobile clients and remote servers. This weakness stems from the application's failure to properly validate X.509 digital certificates during SSL/TLS handshakes, creating an exploitable condition that enables sophisticated attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks without detection. The vulnerability specifically affects the certificate verification process, which is a cornerstone of secure communication protocols designed to ensure that clients are communicating with legitimate servers rather than malicious intermediaries.
From a technical perspective, the flaw manifests as a complete absence of certificate validation mechanisms within the Android application's SSL implementation. When the Misli.com app establishes secure connections to its backend services, it fails to perform the essential steps required to verify certificate authenticity including checking certificate chains, validating issuer information, and confirming that certificates have not been revoked. This represents a direct violation of established security protocols and constitutes a serious deviation from industry standards for mobile application security. The vulnerability directly maps to CWE-295, which specifically addresses "Improper Certificate Validation" in security implementations, and falls under the broader category of cryptographic failures that compromise the trust model of secure communications.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends far beyond simple data interception, as it enables attackers to establish complete control over communication channels between the mobile application and backend services. An attacker positioned within the network path can present a forged certificate that appears legitimate to the vulnerable application, allowing them to decrypt, modify, or redirect sensitive user data including personal information, authentication credentials, and potentially financial transaction details. This vulnerability creates an attack surface that aligns with multiple ATT&CK tactics including initial access through network infiltration, credential access via stolen session data, and command and control activities that could enable further exploitation. The implications are particularly severe given that mobile applications often handle highly sensitive personal data and authentication information that could be leveraged for identity theft, financial fraud, and other malicious activities.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability require immediate implementation of proper certificate validation mechanisms within the application's SSL stack. Security teams should implement certificate pinning techniques that explicitly define which certificates or certificate authorities are trusted, thereby preventing the acceptance of forged certificates even if they appear valid. The application must be updated to perform comprehensive certificate chain validation, including checking certificate expiration dates, verifying certificate signatures, and ensuring proper certificate issuer relationships. Additionally, network-level security controls should be implemented to detect and prevent man-in-the-middle attacks, including the deployment of network monitoring tools that can identify suspicious certificate exchanges. Organizations should also consider implementing additional security layers such as mutual authentication where both client and server verify each other's identities, and regular security audits to ensure that similar validation gaps do not exist in other mobile application components or network services. The remediation process must follow established security frameworks and best practices including the OWASP Mobile Security Project guidelines for secure mobile application development and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework for comprehensive security management.