CVE-2016-4019 in Zimbra Collaborationinfo

Summary

by MITRE

Unspecified vulnerability in Zimbra Collaboration before 8.7.0 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors, aka bug 104477.

Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 05/13/2026

The vulnerability identified as CVE-2016-4019 represents a critical security flaw within Zimbra Collaboration software versions prior to 8.7.0, specifically affecting the integrity of the system through unspecified attack vectors. This issue falls under the broader category of software security vulnerabilities that can compromise data integrity and potentially lead to unauthorized modifications of system components or user data. The vulnerability was catalogued as bug 104477 within Zimbra's internal tracking systems, indicating that it was recognized and documented by the software vendor's development team. The unspecified nature of the attack vectors suggests that the vulnerability could potentially be exploited through multiple pathways, making it particularly concerning for security professionals who must consider all possible attack surfaces. The vulnerability's classification as affecting integrity rather than confidentiality or availability indicates that attackers could manipulate or alter data within the system without necessarily gaining full access or disrupting services. This type of vulnerability is particularly dangerous because it can allow attackers to silently modify system configurations, user data, or application logic without detection, potentially leading to more severe consequences down the line. The vulnerability's presence in pre-8.7.0 versions demonstrates that Zimbra had not yet addressed this particular integrity issue in their security hardening efforts.

The technical nature of this vulnerability involves underlying mechanisms within Zimbra Collaboration that fail to properly validate or authenticate modifications to system components, potentially allowing unauthorized entities to inject malicious data or alter existing configurations. This flaw likely resides in the application's input validation processes, authentication mechanisms, or data processing pipelines that handle user requests or system updates. The unspecified vectors suggest that the vulnerability could manifest through various attack methods including but not limited to injection attacks, privilege escalation, or manipulation of API endpoints. From a cybersecurity perspective, this vulnerability would align with CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) or similar integrity-focused weaknesses that allow unauthorized modification of system state. The attack surface for such vulnerabilities typically includes web interfaces, API endpoints, administrative interfaces, and any component that processes external input or modifies system configuration parameters. The vulnerability's impact on integrity means that even if other security controls remain intact, the compromised system could be silently manipulated to serve malicious purposes or hide attacker activities. This characteristic makes the vulnerability particularly insidious as it can persist undetected while gradually compromising system trustworthiness and data reliability.

The operational impact of CVE-2016-4019 extends beyond immediate data integrity concerns to encompass broader organizational security implications that can affect business continuity, regulatory compliance, and user trust. Organizations utilizing affected Zimbra versions would face potential data corruption, unauthorized configuration changes, and possible escalation to full system compromise if attackers leverage this vulnerability to gain additional privileges. The vulnerability could enable attackers to modify email routing rules, alter user permissions, or manipulate system settings that affect email delivery and security policies. In enterprise environments, this could lead to significant disruptions in communication workflows, potential data exfiltration through modified email rules, or the establishment of persistent backdoors through configuration changes. The integrity compromise could also affect audit trails and logging mechanisms, making it difficult for security teams to detect or investigate suspicious activities. From an industry compliance standpoint, organizations using vulnerable versions would be at risk of violating data protection regulations that require maintaining data integrity and implementing proper access controls. The vulnerability's potential for silent operation means that organizations could remain unaware of ongoing attacks for extended periods, allowing attackers to establish long-term presence within networks and conduct reconnaissance or data collection activities. This type of vulnerability also impacts the overall security posture by potentially providing attackers with a foothold that could be used to pivot to other systems within the network infrastructure.

Organizations should immediately implement mitigation strategies focusing on updating to Zimbra Collaboration 8.7.0 or later versions where this vulnerability has been addressed through proper security patches and code modifications. The recommended approach involves conducting comprehensive vulnerability assessments to identify all systems running affected Zimbra versions and prioritizing their immediate patching. Security teams should also implement network monitoring solutions to detect unusual configuration changes or data modifications that could indicate exploitation attempts. The mitigation process should include reviewing existing access controls, implementing additional validation checks for system modifications, and establishing robust logging and alerting mechanisms to detect integrity violations. Organizations should also consider implementing network segmentation to limit the potential impact of successful exploitation attempts and reduce the attack surface available to potential attackers. From a compliance perspective, the vulnerability requires immediate attention to ensure adherence to security standards such as those outlined in the NIST Cybersecurity Framework or ISO 27001 requirements for maintaining data integrity and implementing proper access controls. The remediation process should include thorough testing of patched systems to ensure that the vulnerability has been properly addressed without introducing new issues or breaking existing functionality. Security teams should also conduct regular vulnerability scanning to identify any remaining weaknesses in their Zimbra implementations and establish ongoing monitoring procedures to detect similar vulnerabilities that may arise in the future. The vulnerability serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining current security patches and implementing comprehensive security monitoring to protect against evolving threats in the cybersecurity landscape.

Reservation

04/14/2016

Disclosure

01/18/2017

Moderation

accepted

Entry

2

Relate

show

CPE

ready

EPSS

0.00398

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!