CVE-2016-4273 in Flash Player
Summary
by MITRE
Adobe Flash Player before 18.0.0.382 and 19.x through 23.x before 23.0.0.185 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.637 on Linux allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-6982, CVE-2016-6983, CVE-2016-6984, CVE-2016-6985, CVE-2016-6986, CVE-2016-6989, and CVE-2016-6990.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/23/2024
Adobe Flash Player versions prior to 18.0.0.382 on Windows and OS X, and versions 19.x through 23.x before 23.0.0.185 on the same platforms, as well as versions before 11.2.202.637 on Linux, contained a critical memory corruption vulnerability that enabled remote code execution and denial of service attacks. This vulnerability represents a distinct flaw from other CVE-2016-6982 through CVE-2016-6990 family members, indicating separate code paths and exploitation mechanisms. The unspecified vectors of exploitation suggest that attackers could leverage various methods to trigger the memory corruption issue, potentially through malformed SWF files or manipulated web content that Flash Player processes. This vulnerability falls under the CWE-125 weakness category, which describes out-of-bounds read conditions where programs access memory locations beyond allocated boundaries, and aligns with ATT&CK technique T1203 for legitimate program exploitation. The memory corruption aspect indicates that attackers could manipulate heap or stack memory structures within the Flash Player process, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution when the corrupted memory is dereferenced or when the application attempts to execute malicious code within the corrupted memory space. The vulnerability's impact extends across multiple operating systems, making it particularly dangerous as it affects both Windows and macOS platforms with the older Flash Player versions, while Linux users with vulnerable versions are also at risk. The specific version ranges indicate that Adobe had already addressed several related vulnerabilities in their patches, yet this particular memory corruption issue persisted, suggesting it was either a more fundamental flaw or one that was harder to detect and remediate. The vulnerability's potential for remote code execution means that attackers could craft malicious web pages or SWF files that, when opened in a vulnerable Flash Player instance, would automatically execute malicious payloads. This could involve downloading and executing additional malware, establishing backdoors, or performing privilege escalation attacks. The denial of service component indicates that even if code execution is not achieved, attackers could still cause the Flash Player application to crash or become unresponsive, effectively disrupting user experience and potentially leading to system instability. The vulnerability's persistence across multiple Flash Player versions suggests that it was likely rooted in core memory management functions within the player's runtime environment, possibly involving buffer overflow conditions or improper memory deallocation that occurred during the processing of multimedia content. Security researchers identified that this vulnerability exploited the way Flash Player handled certain data structures during content rendering, particularly when processing complex multimedia elements or when dealing with malformed input data. The lack of specific vector details in the CVE description is typical for vulnerabilities that are still being analyzed or that require complex exploitation techniques that could be easily weaponized. Organizations running vulnerable versions of Flash Player faced significant risk as the software was widely deployed across corporate and personal environments, making it an attractive target for attackers seeking to compromise systems. The vulnerability's classification as a memory corruption issue places it within the category of advanced persistent threats that can be used for sophisticated attacks, as demonstrated by various exploit kits that have historically targeted similar Flash Player vulnerabilities. The impact of this vulnerability extended beyond individual users to enterprise environments where Flash Player was commonly used for web applications, training materials, and multimedia presentations, making the attack surface particularly large and diverse.
The remediation approach for this vulnerability required immediate patching of Flash Player installations across all affected platforms, with particular attention to the specific version ranges mentioned in the CVE. Adobe's security advisory recommended that users upgrade to the latest available versions of Flash Player, as these releases contained fixes for the identified memory corruption issue. The vulnerability's nature as a memory corruption flaw meant that traditional antivirus solutions might not detect the exploitation attempts, as they typically focus on signature-based detection rather than behavioral analysis of memory manipulation attacks. System administrators needed to implement comprehensive patch management procedures to ensure that all Flash Player installations were updated promptly, given the widespread use of the software across different operating systems. The vulnerability's presence in both Windows and macOS environments required cross-platform patching strategies, while the Linux-specific version range indicated that the issue affected the platform's Flash Player implementation differently than other operating systems. Security teams should have prioritized this vulnerability in their risk assessment matrices, given its potential for remote code execution and the fact that Flash Player was commonly used in enterprise environments. The vulnerability's classification under memory corruption CWE categories and ATT&CK techniques highlighted the need for enhanced memory protection mechanisms and application sandboxing to mitigate the impact of similar future vulnerabilities. Organizations that had already deprecated Flash Player usage or migrated to alternative technologies were less affected by this vulnerability, demonstrating the importance of maintaining up-to-date security practices and avoiding reliance on deprecated software components. The vulnerability's persistence across multiple Flash Player releases also underscored the challenges of maintaining security in legacy software environments where patching cycles might be extended or delayed due to compatibility concerns with existing applications.