CVE-2022-43814
Summary
by MITRE • 01/01/2023
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/10/2026
The rejection of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) record indicates that the assigned identifier was never utilized by any vendor or project to document a specific security flaw within their software ecosystem. In the context of vulnerability management, a CVE ID serves as a unique key for tracking known information security vulnerabilities across different platforms and databases. When an organization such as a CNA rejects a record due to non-use, it signifies that no public disclosure, advisory, or patch was ever released under this specific identifier by any affected party. This situation often arises when a vulnerability is identified internally but remediated before public exposure, or when the reported issue does not meet the threshold for being classified as a security-relevant flaw requiring global tracking.
From a technical perspective, the absence of an active CVE record means there are no associated Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) metrics, no reference to specific CWE classifications such as improper input validation or insecure default configurations, and no mapping to MITRE ATT&CK techniques for exploitation scenarios. Consequently, security tools that rely on CVE identifiers for vulnerability scanning will not flag systems based on this rejected record. This prevents false positives in automated compliance checks and ensures that threat intelligence feeds remain accurate by excluding entries that lack verifiable impact or vendor acknowledgment.
The operational impact of a rejected CVE is primarily administrative rather than technical. It does not imply that the underlying codebase is secure, but rather that no specific vulnerability was officially recognized under this ID for public remediation tracking. Organizations relying on automated patch management systems will simply ignore this identifier during their periodic scans. This maintains the integrity of vulnerability databases by ensuring they contain only actionable and verified entries, thereby reducing noise in security operations centers and allowing analysts to focus on active threats with documented exploitability and impact metrics.
To maintain robust cybersecurity hygiene despite such administrative rejections, organizations should continue to adhere to established standards like CWE for identifying common weakness types during code reviews and threat modeling exercises. Furthermore, leveraging the MITRE ATT&CK framework can help in understanding potential attack vectors even when specific CVEs are not available or have been rejected. Regular internal vulnerability assessments and penetration testing remain essential practices to uncover flaws that may never receive a public CVE assignment but still pose significant risks to infrastructure security.