CVE-2024-10414 in Vehicle Record System
Summary
by MITRE • 10/27/2024
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in PHPGurukul Vehicle Record System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/edit-brand.php. The manipulation of the argument Brand Name leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The initial researcher advisory mentions the parameter "phone_number" to be affected. But this might be a mistake because the textbox field label is "Brand Name".
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 03/02/2025
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-10414 represents a cross site scripting flaw within the PHPGurukul Vehicle Record System version 1.0, specifically impacting the administrative interface component located at /admin/edit-brand.php. This weakness falls under the category of input validation and output encoding failures, which are commonly classified as CWE-79 in the Common Weakness Enumeration system. The vulnerability manifests when an attacker manipulates the Brand Name parameter through a web interface, allowing malicious script execution within the context of a victim's browser session. The issue is particularly concerning as it operates entirely within the web application layer, making it susceptible to exploitation through standard web browser interactions without requiring any specialized tools or privileges.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input within the administrative brand editing functionality. When users submit data through the Brand Name field, the application fails to properly validate or encode the input before rendering it back to the user interface. This creates an opportunity for attackers to inject malicious javascript code that will execute whenever the affected page is viewed by other users. The vulnerability's remote exploitation capability means that an attacker can craft malicious payloads and deliver them through web browsers without needing physical access to the system. The attack vector specifically targets the web application's handling of user input, which aligns with ATT&CK technique T1566.001 for credential access through phishing attacks.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple script execution, as it can enable attackers to perform various malicious activities including session hijacking, data theft, and redirection to malicious websites. The disclosed exploit demonstrates how an attacker can leverage this flaw to inject javascript code that could capture user credentials, modify application behavior, or redirect users to phishing sites. The fact that this vulnerability has been publicly disclosed increases the risk profile significantly, as it removes the element of surprise that attackers typically rely on for successful exploitation. Security researchers have noted that the initial advisory's mention of phone_number as the affected parameter appears to be incorrect, with the actual vulnerable field being the Brand Name textbox, which further emphasizes the importance of proper input validation across all user-facing application components.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should focus on implementing robust input validation and output encoding mechanisms throughout the application. The primary fix involves sanitizing all user input before processing or displaying it within the web interface, utilizing proper HTML encoding techniques to prevent script injection. Organizations should implement Content Security Policy headers to limit the execution of inline scripts and establish proper input validation routines that reject or sanitize potentially malicious content. Additionally, the application should employ parameterized queries and input filtering to prevent various injection attacks. The remediation process should include comprehensive code review of all administrative interfaces to identify similar vulnerabilities, along with implementing automated security testing procedures to detect such issues before they can be exploited in production environments. Regular security assessments and vulnerability scanning should be conducted to ensure that similar weaknesses do not exist in other parts of the application.