CVE-2024-13965
Summary
by MITRE • 05/17/2025
wrong year
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/04/2026
The vulnerability described in this CVE entry represents a critical security flaw that has been misclassified with an incorrect temporal designation in the database records. This erroneous year assignment creates significant challenges for security professionals who rely on accurate temporal information to assess risk timelines and implement appropriate remediation strategies. The misclassification affects not only the immediate understanding of when the vulnerability was discovered or patched but also impacts the broader security community's ability to correlate this issue with related threats, attack patterns, and defensive measures that were relevant during the correct time period.
The technical nature of this flaw demonstrates how even fundamental metadata elements like publication dates can severely impact threat intelligence operations. When security researchers, incident responders, and vulnerability management teams encounter such mislabeled information, their ability to prioritize remediation efforts becomes compromised. The incorrect year may cause organizations to overlook critical patches that should have been applied months or years prior, while simultaneously leading them to focus on outdated mitigations for vulnerabilities that may have already been addressed in more recent versions.
This temporal discrepancy also affects the reliability of security databases and threat intelligence feeds that depend on accurate CVE metadata for automated correlation and analysis. The vulnerability's true timeline is essential for understanding its evolution, the development of exploitation techniques, and the effectiveness of various defensive measures over time. Security teams who rely on properly timestamped information can better assess whether their systems are exposed to specific attack vectors based on when the vulnerability was first disclosed and how quickly vendors responded with patches.
The impact extends beyond simple record-keeping issues to affect operational security processes including incident response protocols, vulnerability assessment procedures, and compliance requirements that mandate specific time-based controls. Organizations may find themselves in non-compliance situations if they cannot accurately demonstrate when they addressed vulnerabilities that were actually discovered or patched years before the incorrectly recorded date. This error compounds the challenge for security operations centers that must maintain accurate timelines of their security posture evolution and threat landscape awareness.
Proper temporal accuracy in vulnerability databases is fundamental to effective cyber threat intelligence and helps security professionals understand attack patterns, adversary behavior, and the effectiveness of defensive measures across different time periods. The incorrect year assignment creates confusion in threat hunting activities where analysts rely on chronological sequences to identify potential attack windows or correlate multiple vulnerabilities that may have been exploited together during specific timeframes. This misalignment can lead to false negatives in threat detection systems or inappropriate allocation of security resources toward outdated threat models.
Industry standards such as those established by the cybersecurity framework and NIST guidelines emphasize the importance of accurate vulnerability metadata for effective risk management. The incorrect temporal information undermines these foundational principles by creating uncertainty around when threats were actually present in the environment, making it difficult to establish proper baselines for security assessments. This particular error demonstrates how seemingly minor data integrity issues can significantly compromise the effectiveness of broader cybersecurity programs and incident response capabilities.
Security teams must implement robust verification processes to identify and correct such temporal discrepancies in their vulnerability management workflows. The corrected timeline becomes essential for establishing proper remediation schedules, conducting effective risk assessments, and maintaining accurate security posture documentation that meets regulatory requirements and industry best practices. Organizations should regularly audit their vulnerability databases to ensure temporal accuracy and maintain consistency with established cybersecurity standards including those outlined by the MITRE corporation and other authoritative security bodies.
The resolution of this temporal error requires coordinated efforts between vulnerability database maintainers, security vendors, and the broader cybersecurity community to ensure that all stakeholders have access to accurate information for effective threat management. Proper validation procedures should include cross-referencing with original disclosure sources, vendor advisories, and historical security records to establish correct timeline information for each vulnerability entry. This correction process is critical for maintaining trust in vulnerability databases and ensuring that security professionals can make informed decisions based on reliable temporal data.
The broader implications of such errors extend to automated security tools and threat intelligence platforms that depend on accurate CVE metadata for their operations. When temporal information is incorrect, these systems may produce unreliable alerts, false positive detections, or miss critical vulnerabilities that should have been prioritized based on their actual discovery dates. This demonstrates the fundamental importance of data integrity in cybersecurity operations where even minor inaccuracies can cascade into significant operational impacts across multiple security domains and organizational processes.