CVE-2024-23405
Summary
by MITRE • 01/01/2025
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/07/2026
CVE records that remain unused or unutilized pose significant challenges to cybersecurity operations and threat intelligence frameworks. When a vulnerability identifier is created but never actively employed in security advisories, incident reports, or threat hunting activities, it represents a gap in the collective knowledge base that security professionals rely upon for proactive defense measures. The absence of usage patterns indicates that either the vulnerability was incorrectly identified, lacks sufficient evidence to support its existence, or has been deemed too low severity to warrant attention from the cybersecurity community.
The technical implications of unused CVE records extend beyond simple administrative concerns and can undermine the effectiveness of vulnerability management programs across organizations. Security teams depend on standardized identifiers to track, prioritize, and remediate threats consistently across their infrastructure. When a CVE record exists without supporting data or validation, it creates confusion during vulnerability assessments and can lead to false positives in automated scanning tools. The lack of operational context around unused records also prevents security researchers from correlating related threats or identifying potential attack patterns that might emerge from similar vulnerabilities.
From a compliance perspective, the maintenance of unused CVE records violates established governance principles within cybersecurity frameworks. Organizations following standards such as iso 27001 or nist cyber security framework expect documented processes for vulnerability identification and management. Unused records suggest poor quality control in the vulnerability identification process and may indicate gaps in the validation procedures that should be in place before any CVE is formally assigned. The cve program itself enforces strict rules requiring active usage to ensure that only verified and relevant threats receive official identification status.
Industry best practices recommend that all assigned CVE identifiers must demonstrate clear evidence of existence and potential impact to maintain the integrity of the vulnerability database. When records remain unused, they represent wasted resources in terms of both human capital and technical infrastructure maintenance. Security operations centers often integrate CVE data into their monitoring systems and incident response procedures, making it essential that every identifier corresponds to actual threat intelligence. The absence of usage patterns also prevents proper categorization within threat intelligence platforms, leading to incomplete risk assessments and potentially leaving critical vulnerabilities unaddressed.
Organizations implementing cybersecurity frameworks such as the attack tree methodology or enterprise attack surface management initiatives require accurate and validated vulnerability data to properly assess their security posture. Unused CVE records create noise in these systems that can obscure legitimate threats and reduce the effectiveness of automated security tools. The cwe (common weakness enumeration) database specifically addresses weaknesses that lead to vulnerabilities, but unused CVEs do not contribute meaningfully to this knowledge base without active usage patterns that demonstrate real-world exploitation or potential impact scenarios.
The operational impact of unused CVE records becomes particularly evident during security audits and compliance assessments where auditors expect evidence of proper vulnerability management processes. When organizations cannot demonstrate active utilization of their assigned CVE identifiers, it may indicate inadequate threat intelligence capabilities or poor integration between vulnerability management systems and incident response procedures. This lack of engagement with CVE data can undermine confidence in an organization's overall cybersecurity maturity and potentially lead to regulatory non-compliance issues.
Effective mitigation strategies for unused CVE records involve establishing clear validation criteria before identifier assignment and implementing regular review processes to identify and retire unused entries. Organizations should maintain detailed documentation showing how each CVE identifier relates to specific threat intelligence or incident data, ensuring that every assigned identifier corresponds to actual security concerns rather than theoretical possibilities. The cve program's own policies require evidence of actual vulnerability exploitation or significant threat potential before assigning identifiers, making unused records a violation of these fundamental principles and highlighting the importance of maintaining rigorous quality standards in vulnerability management processes.