CVE-2024-23412
Summary
by MITRE • 01/01/2025
To maintain compliance with CNA rules, we have rejected this CVE record because it has not been used.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/17/2026
This CVE record rejection represents a procedural compliance issue rather than a technical vulnerability assessment. According to CVE Numbering Authority guidelines, CVE records must demonstrate actual usage or exploitation to maintain valid status within the CVE database. The rejection indicates that the record was not associated with any published security advisories, vulnerability assessments, or security tools that would validate its existence in the cybersecurity ecosystem. This situation typically occurs when organizations submit CVE requests without proper documentation of the vulnerability's discovery, analysis, or public disclosure. The CNA rules require that CVE records be substantiated through verifiable evidence of security impacts, which includes references to security advisories, vulnerability databases, or other authoritative sources that demonstrate the record's legitimacy within the cybersecurity community. Without such validation, the CVE record becomes invalid and is removed from the official registry.
The technical implications of this rejection extend beyond simple administrative procedures to reflect fundamental security practices. When CVE records are not properly maintained or validated, it creates gaps in vulnerability tracking systems that security professionals rely upon for threat intelligence and remediation planning. This can lead to situations where legitimate vulnerabilities may not be properly catalogued or prioritized within security operations centers, potentially resulting in delayed response times or incomplete threat coverage. The absence of validated CVE records also impacts automated security tools and vulnerability management systems that depend on standardized vulnerability identifiers to correlate threat data and prioritize security patches. Organizations must ensure that their vulnerability disclosure processes include proper documentation and validation steps to maintain compliance with CVE standards.
Security organizations should implement robust processes to validate CVE submissions before finalization to prevent such rejections. This includes maintaining detailed documentation of vulnerability discovery, analysis, and impact assessment that can be referenced during the CVE submission process. The validation process should include peer review, technical verification, and alignment with established security frameworks such as those defined by the Common Weakness Enumeration or MITRE ATT&CK framework. Organizations must also establish clear communication channels with their designated CNA to ensure that CVE records meet all necessary requirements for acceptance and long-term validity. Proper CVE management practices help maintain the integrity of vulnerability databases and ensure that security teams have access to accurate, standardized information for threat response and mitigation activities. This validation process becomes particularly critical when organizations operate in regulated environments where compliance with security standards and vulnerability management protocols is mandatory.