CVE-2024-32547 in Code Insert Manager Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 04/17/2024
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Max Bond Code Insert Manager (Q2W3 Inc Manager) allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Code Insert Manager (Q2W3 Inc Manager): from n/a through 2.5.3.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 04/05/2025
The CVE-2024-32547 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site scripting flaw within the Max Bond Code Insert Manager plugin, specifically affecting versions through 2.5.3. This reflected XSS vulnerability occurs during web page generation when the application fails to properly sanitize user input before incorporating it into dynamic web content. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation and output encoding mechanisms within the plugin's code generation processes, creating an attack vector where malicious actors can inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. The flaw manifests when the application reflects user-supplied data back to the browser without adequate sanitization, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the context of the victim's browser session.
This vulnerability falls under the CWE-79 category of Cross-Site Scripting, which is classified as a critical weakness in web application security. The ATT&CK framework categorizes this as a code injection technique under the T1190 attack pattern, specifically targeting web applications through reflected input manipulation. The vulnerability's impact is particularly severe as it allows attackers to bypass standard security controls and execute malicious code directly within user browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or redirection to malicious sites. The reflected nature of this vulnerability means that the malicious payload must be crafted to be included in a URL or HTTP request, making it particularly dangerous for web applications that do not properly validate or sanitize input parameters.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple script execution, as it can enable sophisticated attack chains that compromise entire user sessions and potentially lead to complete system compromise. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious URLs containing XSS payloads that, when clicked by unsuspecting users, execute malicious scripts in their browsers. These scripts can steal session cookies, modify page content, redirect users to phishing sites, or perform actions on behalf of authenticated users. The vulnerability affects the plugin's functionality across all supported versions, making it a persistent threat that requires immediate remediation. The reflected XSS nature also means that the attack is typically delivered through social engineering tactics, where users are tricked into clicking malicious links that contain the XSS payload.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should include immediate patching of the affected plugin to version 2.5.4 or later, which contains the necessary input sanitization and output encoding fixes. Organizations should implement comprehensive input validation mechanisms that properly encode all user-supplied data before incorporating it into web page content, following the principle of least privilege for plugin functionality. Additionally, implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can provide an additional layer of protection against XSS attacks by restricting script execution. Security monitoring should be enhanced to detect unusual patterns in plugin usage and input handling, while regular security audits should verify that all web applications properly sanitize user input. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of secure coding practices and regular security assessments to prevent similar issues in other components of the application ecosystem.