CVE-2025-22699 in Traveler Code Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 02/04/2025
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in NotFound Traveler Code. This issue affects Traveler Code: from n/a through 3.1.0.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 02/04/2025
The CVE-2025-22699 vulnerability represents a critical SQL injection flaw within the NotFound Traveler Code application, specifically impacting versions ranging from n/a through 3.1.0. This vulnerability falls under the CWE-89 category, which categorizes improper neutralization of special elements used in SQL commands as a fundamental weakness in software security. The flaw manifests when the application fails to properly sanitize or escape user input before incorporating it into SQL queries, creating an avenue for malicious actors to manipulate database operations through crafted input sequences.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability occurs when user-supplied data enters the application's SQL execution path without adequate validation or sanitization measures. Attackers can leverage this weakness by injecting malicious SQL code fragments through input fields, parameters, or API endpoints that interact with the database. The vulnerability's impact extends beyond simple data theft, as successful exploitation could enable unauthorized database access, data modification, deletion, or even privilege escalation within the database environment. The affected Traveler Code application likely processes user input through direct SQL query construction rather than employing prepared statements or parameterized queries, which would otherwise prevent such injection attacks.
Operationally, this vulnerability poses significant risks to organizations utilizing the NotFound Traveler Code platform, particularly those handling sensitive travel-related data including personal information, booking details, and payment records. The attack surface is broad as the vulnerability affects multiple versions of the software, suggesting it may be a persistent design flaw rather than a temporary coding error. Security teams face the challenge of identifying all potential entry points where user input transitions into SQL operations, which could include web forms, API endpoints, or direct database interaction mechanisms. The exploitation timeline is relatively swift once attackers identify the vulnerable parameters, making this a high-priority remediation target.
Organizations should immediately implement comprehensive input validation and sanitization measures across all application components that interface with databases. The recommended mitigations include adopting parameterized queries or prepared statements to separate SQL code from user data, implementing proper input encoding and escaping mechanisms, and establishing robust output filtering to prevent malicious code execution. Additionally, implementing Web Application Firewalls and database activity monitoring can provide additional layers of defense against exploitation attempts. The remediation process must include thorough code review to identify all instances where user input directly influences SQL command construction, with particular attention to legacy code sections that may not follow modern security best practices. Compliance with OWASP Top Ten security guidelines and adherence to secure coding standards such as those defined in the Open Web Application Security Project framework should be prioritized during the remediation phase to prevent similar vulnerabilities from emerging in future releases.