CVE-2025-58587 in Baggage Analyticsinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 10/06/2025

The application does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it possible for an attacker to guess user credentials.

If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 01/28/2026

The vulnerability described in CVE-2025-58587 represents a critical weakness in authentication security mechanisms that directly enables credential guessing attacks. This flaw manifests when an application fails to implement adequate rate limiting or account lockout policies to prevent automated brute force or dictionary attacks against user credentials. The absence of such protective measures creates an exploitable condition where malicious actors can systematically test numerous credential combinations without facing significant delays or account restrictions. This vulnerability falls under the broader category of insufficient account lockout mechanisms, which is classified as CWE-307, and specifically aligns with the ATT&CK technique T1110.003 for Brute Force. The impact of this weakness extends beyond simple unauthorized access as it can facilitate credential stuffing attacks, where compromised credentials from one service are tested against other platforms, amplifying the potential damage.

The technical implementation of this vulnerability typically occurs when authentication systems lack proper monitoring of failed login attempts or fail to enforce time-based restrictions on authentication requests. Attackers can exploit this by creating automated scripts that rapidly iterate through common username and password combinations, or by utilizing precomputed credential lists to maximize their chances of success. The short time frame mentioned in the description suggests that the application does not implement sliding window algorithms or exponential backoff mechanisms that would normally slow down repeated authentication attempts. This allows attackers to maintain high throughput of login attempts, significantly reducing the time required to discover valid credentials through systematic guessing.

From an operational perspective, this vulnerability poses severe risks to organizational security posture and can lead to unauthorized system access, data breaches, and potential lateral movement within networks. The ease of exploitation means that even relatively simple attacks can succeed, particularly when targeting weak or commonly used passwords. Organizations may experience increased incident response costs, potential compliance violations, and reputational damage if successful attacks occur. The vulnerability also creates opportunities for attackers to establish persistent access through credential compromise, potentially enabling more sophisticated attack vectors such as privilege escalation or data exfiltration. This weakness can be particularly damaging in environments where user accounts have elevated privileges or where the application handles sensitive data.

Effective mitigation strategies for CVE-2025-58587 involve implementing robust authentication controls including adaptive rate limiting, account lockout policies, and multi-factor authentication mechanisms. Organizations should deploy systems that track failed authentication attempts and implement appropriate delays or account restrictions after a configurable number of failures. The solution should incorporate time-based restrictions that increase exponentially with consecutive failed attempts, following established security frameworks such as NIST SP 800-63B for authentication guidance. Additional protective measures include implementing account lockout mechanisms that require administrative intervention for unlock procedures, deploying intrusion detection systems to monitor for suspicious authentication patterns, and ensuring proper logging and monitoring of authentication events. The implementation should also consider user experience balance to prevent legitimate users from being locked out while maintaining security effectiveness. Regular security assessments and penetration testing should validate that these controls are properly configured and functioning as intended, ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Responsible

SICK AG

Reservation

09/03/2025

Disclosure

10/06/2025

Moderation

accepted

CPE

ready

EPSS

0.00465

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!