CVE-2026-102160 in CloudVision CUE
Summary
by MITRE • 10/06/2026
An operating system (OS) command injection vulnerability in CloudVision CUE backup management may allow an authenticated Super User to submit a crafted backup request and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the affected service.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/07/2026
The identified security flaw resides within the CloudVision platform, specifically affecting its Common Unix Environment or CUE component responsible for managing system backups. This vulnerability is classified as an OS command injection, which represents a critical class of software defects where untrusted input is improperly concatenated into operating system commands without adequate sanitization or validation. In this specific context, the attack vector requires authentication, meaning that only users with Super User privileges can exploit this weakness. While the requirement for high-level credentials limits the immediate threat surface compared to remote code execution vulnerabilities accessible by anonymous attackers, it still poses a severe risk to environments where insider threats exist or if an attacker has compromised administrative accounts through other means such as credential stuffing or phishing attacks.
From a technical perspective, the vulnerability likely stems from how the backup management module processes user-supplied parameters for backup requests. When constructing shell commands to initiate backup procedures, the application fails to properly escape special characters or validate input against a strict allowlist of expected values. This allows an authenticated attacker to inject malicious command sequences into the execution pipeline. By crafting specific HTTP requests with manipulated fields in the backup configuration, the attacker can break out of the intended context and append arbitrary operating system commands. These commands are then executed by the backend service process, which typically runs with elevated privileges necessary for performing file system operations like reading or writing large data sets during backups.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is significant due to the privilege level associated with Super User accounts. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the underlying host operating system. This can lead to a complete compromise of the CloudVision infrastructure, including unauthorized access to sensitive network configuration data stored in backup files, modification or deletion of critical system logs and configurations, and potentially using the compromised server as a pivot point for lateral movement within the enterprise network. The attacker could establish persistent backdoors, install rootkits, or exfiltrate proprietary intelligence related to the organization's network topology and security policies.
This vulnerability aligns with CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command commonly known as OS Command Injection. It also maps to MITRE ATT&CK techniques such as T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter, which describes adversaries using native operating system utilities to execute commands on victim systems. Furthermore, the requirement for authentication places this within the context of privilege escalation or abuse of existing privileges rather than initial access via unauthenticated vectors.
Mitigation strategies should focus primarily on patching the affected CloudVision CUE component with updates provided by the vendor that address input validation and command construction logic. In addition to applying patches, organizations should enforce strict least-privilege principles for Super User accounts, ensuring that these credentials are protected with multi-factor authentication and monitored closely for anomalous activity. Network segmentation can also help limit the blast radius if a compromise occurs, preventing lateral movement from the CloudVision server to other critical assets. Regular auditing of backup processes and monitoring system logs for unusual command executions or file access patterns will aid in early detection of exploitation attempts.