CVE-2026-10764 in BVMS
Summary
by MITRE • 09/30/2026
Information disclosure in BVMS 4.5 up to 12.3 including allows man-in-the-middle attackers to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/30/2026
The vulnerability identified within Bode Visual Management System versions 4.5 through 12.3 represents a critical information disclosure flaw that facilitates unauthorized interception of sensitive operational data by man-in-the-middle attackers. This security deficiency stems from the application's failure to enforce robust encryption protocols during communication between its components or with external clients, allowing network adversaries positioned within the same broadcast domain or routing path to capture and analyze unencrypted traffic streams. The absence of proper transport layer security mechanisms creates a direct pathway for eavesdropping, where attackers can passively monitor data exchanges without triggering immediate intrusion detection alerts due to the legitimate nature of the intercepted packets.
From a technical perspective, this flaw aligns with CWE-319, which classifies cleartext transmission of sensitive information as a significant weakness in software design and implementation. The vulnerability likely involves the use of HTTP or other unencrypted protocols for transmitting configuration data, user credentials, video stream metadata, or system logs instead of HTTPS with valid certificate validation. This architectural oversight permits attackers to perform traffic analysis using standard packet capture tools such as Wireshark or tcpdump to extract plaintext payloads that contain proprietary algorithms, administrative passwords, and real-time surveillance feeds. The impact is compounded by the fact that BVMS serves critical infrastructure environments where continuous monitoring and secure data integrity are paramount for public safety and asset protection.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple data leakage to include potential compromise of system integrity and availability. By gaining access to sensitive configuration parameters, an attacker can map out the network topology, identify vulnerable endpoints, and potentially prepare for more sophisticated attacks such as session hijacking or command injection if additional vectors are present. Furthermore, the exposure of video management metadata may reveal patterns in security operations that could be exploited by physical threat actors to bypass surveillance coverage during specific time windows. This level of access undermines the fundamental trust model required for enterprise-grade security systems and violates compliance requirements related to data protection standards such as GDPR or HIPAA if personally identifiable information is transmitted over these unsecured channels.
Mitigation strategies must prioritize immediate remediation through network segmentation and protocol hardening. Administrators should enforce strict firewall rules that restrict BVMS communication ports to only authorized management stations, thereby limiting the attack surface available for man-in-the-middle positioning. Upgrading to a patched version of BVMS where possible is essential, as newer releases typically implement TLS 1.2 or higher with strong cipher suites and certificate pinning to prevent interception. In cases where upgrading is not immediately feasible, implementing network-level encryption via IPsec tunnels between all BVMS components can provide an effective compensating control. Additionally, regular security audits using vulnerability scanners configured to detect cleartext transmission weaknesses should be conducted to ensure that no legacy configurations inadvertently expose sensitive data over unencrypted connections.