CVE-2026-115535 in HospitalManagement
Summary
by MITRE • 10/23/2026
A vulnerability was identified in gedelumbung HospitalManagement up to c2d45543789a3887067d3915f69d44cfc2cf76a8. The affected element is the function sistem.php::simpan of the file application/modules/admin/controllers/sistem.php of the component Settings Handler. The manipulation of the argument Title leads to cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/23/2026
The vulnerability identified in gedelumbung HospitalManagement represents a significant security risk within the application's administrative interface, specifically targeting the Settings Handler component. This flaw resides in the sistem.php file located at application/modules/admin/controllers/sistem.php and is triggered by the simpan function when processing user-supplied input for the Title argument. The core technical issue stems from insufficient validation or sanitization of this specific parameter before it is processed or rendered, allowing an attacker to inject malicious script payloads directly into the application's context. Because the affected element handles system settings, which are often accessed by administrators with elevated privileges, the potential impact extends beyond simple data corruption to include complete compromise of administrative accounts and sensitive hospital management data.
From a technical perspective, this vulnerability is classified as Cross-Site Scripting, commonly referred to as XSS. More specifically, it aligns with CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in the Common Weakness Enumeration standard. The attack vector allows for remote exploitation without requiring prior authentication if the vulnerable endpoint is accessible via GET requests or if session management is weak, although typically such administrative functions require login credentials. However, even authenticated attacks are severe because they can be chained with social engineering tactics to trick administrators into executing malicious scripts while managing system configurations. The presence of a publicly available exploit significantly lowers the barrier for entry, enabling attackers who lack advanced scripting skills to leverage existing tools against this vulnerable version.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is substantial given the nature of hospital management systems which handle sensitive patient and institutional data. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the victim's browser session. This can lead to session hijacking, where the attacker steals administrative cookies or tokens to impersonate a legitimate user. It also facilitates credential harvesting through fake login forms injected into the page, defacement of the application interface, and potentially redirecting users to malicious sites for phishing purposes. In a healthcare environment, such disruptions can interfere with critical workflows and compromise patient privacy regulations like HIPAA if personal data is exfiltrated via stolen sessions or logged by external servers controlled by the attacker.
The development strategy employed by gedelumbung HospitalManagement complicates remediation efforts as it utilizes a rolling release model for continuous delivery. This approach means that version numbers are not static, making it difficult to define precise patch versions in traditional vulnerability databases. The hash c2d45543789a3887067d3915f69d44cfc2cf76a8 serves as a specific identifier for the affected commit state rather than a semantic version tag. Despite being informed early through an issue report, the project has not yet responded or issued a fix, leaving users of this and subsequent builds exposed until upstream code is corrected. This lack of timely response highlights the importance of proactive security monitoring in open-source projects that prioritize rapid feature deployment over immediate vulnerability resolution.
Mitigation strategies should focus on both technical controls and procedural changes while awaiting an official patch from the developers. Administrators should implement strict input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data, particularly within administrative modules handling system settings. Utilizing Content Security Policy headers can help mitigate the impact of successful XSS attacks by restricting the sources from which scripts are allowed to execute. Additionally, deploying Web Application Firewalls with rules specifically tuned to detect common XSS payloads in POST parameters like Title can provide a layer of defense-in-depth. Organizations should also consider isolating administrative interfaces behind additional authentication layers or network restrictions to reduce exposure to remote exploitation attempts until the underlying code flaw is resolved by the vendor.