CVE-2026-117749
Summary
by MITRE • 10/28/2026
Rejected reason: Reserved in error; never associated with a vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/28/2026
The identifier referenced has been officially designated as reserved due to an administrative or procedural error and does not correspond to any known software flaw, security weakness, or exploitable condition within the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures ecosystem. This status indicates that no CVE ID was ever legitimately assigned because there is no underlying technical defect requiring public disclosure or remediation efforts by vendors or users. Consequently, this entry holds no relevance for vulnerability management programs, threat intelligence platforms, or compliance audits as it represents a null state in the tracking database rather than an active security risk.
From a technical perspective, such reserved entries often arise during bulk ID allocations where identifiers are pre-assigned to organizations but never utilized due to lack of reported issues, false positives during initial triage, or administrative cancellations before publication. These records serve as placeholders that have been explicitly marked for exclusion from public vulnerability feeds to prevent confusion and maintain the integrity of security data streams. Security professionals should disregard this identifier when conducting risk assessments, patch management cycles, or incident response investigations since it carries no associated Common Weakness Enumeration classification nor any MITRE ATT&CK technique mapping.
Organizations encountering references to such reserved identifiers in logs, reports, or third-party feeds should verify the source for accuracy and ensure that automated scanning tools are configured to filter out non-vulnerable entries. Maintaining clean vulnerability data is critical for effective prioritization of remediation efforts based on actual exploitability and business impact rather than administrative artifacts. The presence of these reserved codes in public databases does not imply a latent threat but simply reflects the lifecycle management processes used by CVE Numbering Authorities to manage identifier space efficiently while avoiding false alarms that could dilute security team focus.