CVE-2026-117790
Summary
by MITRE • 10/28/2026
Rejected reason: Reserved in error; never associated with a vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/28/2026
The identifier designated as CVE-2024-XXXX has been officially rejected and reserved due to an administrative error, meaning it was erroneously assigned without any corresponding security flaw or exploit scenario being identified. In the context of global cybersecurity infrastructure managed by organizations such as MITRE Corporation under the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures program, each unique identifier serves as a critical reference point for tracking specific software weaknesses that require remediation. When an entry is marked as reserved in error, it indicates that no actual vulnerability exists within any known product or system associated with this number, rendering it invalid for use in security advisories, patch notes, or threat intelligence reports. This situation highlights the importance of rigorous validation processes during the CVE assignment phase to ensure data integrity across vendor databases and consumer tools alike.
From a technical perspective, the existence of such reserved identifiers can cause confusion within automated vulnerability scanning systems if not properly filtered out by database administrators and security information and event management platforms. These systems rely on accurate mappings between CVE IDs and specific Common Weakness Enumerations or ATT&CK techniques to prioritize remediation efforts based on severity and exploitability. An erroneous entry may lead to false positives, wasting organizational resources on investigating non-existent issues or potentially masking real threats if the database becomes cluttered with invalid data points. Consequently, maintaining a clean and accurate vulnerability registry is essential for effective risk management and compliance auditing against standards such as ISO 27001 or NIST SP 800-53 which mandate precise tracking of security defects.
The operational impact of this rejection is primarily administrative rather than technical, affecting the lifecycle management of software vulnerabilities but posing no direct threat to system confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Security teams should disregard any references to this specific CVE ID in future assessments and ensure that their internal documentation reflects its invalid status to prevent miscommunication with stakeholders or regulatory bodies. It serves as a reminder for vendors and researchers to adhere strictly to the submission guidelines provided by the CVE Numbering Authorities, ensuring that all reported issues are verified through reproducible proof of concept before requesting an official identifier. This diligence helps preserve the trustworthiness of the global vulnerability ecosystem and supports more accurate threat modeling and incident response planning across industries.