CVE-2026-117839
Summary
by MITRE • 10/28/2026
Rejected reason: Reserved in error; never associated with a vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/28/2026
The identifier referenced has been officially designated as reserved due to an administrative or procedural error and does not correspond to any known software flaw, security weakness, or exploitable condition within the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures ecosystem. This status indicates that no technical analysis is applicable because there is no underlying vulnerability to assess, exploit, or mitigate. Consequently, this entry holds no relevance for threat intelligence operations, patch management strategies, or risk assessment frameworks such as CVSS scoring models which require a valid CVE identifier linked to a specific defect in code or configuration.
From the perspective of industry standards like CWE and MITRE ATT&CK, there are no associated weakness types or tactical behaviors to map because the entry is non-functional by definition. Security professionals encountering this designation should disregard it during vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, or compliance audits as it represents a null value in security databases rather than an active threat vector. The presence of such reserved identifiers often stems from duplicate submissions, rejected proposals that failed validation criteria, or administrative corrections made to maintain the integrity and uniqueness of the CVE ID space.
Organizations relying on automated vulnerability management tools may encounter this status when querying for specific identifiers, resulting in empty returns or explicit warnings indicating no match found. It is important to distinguish between reserved-in-error entries and those marked as candidate or rejected due to insufficient evidence; while both lack actionable security data, the former specifically denotes a clerical anomaly rather than a substantive evaluation outcome. Users should verify alternative identifiers if they suspect a mislabeling occurred during initial submission processes involving National CVE Numbering Authorities or Recognized Security Providers.
In practical terms, this designation serves as a placeholder to prevent confusion with legitimate vulnerabilities that might share similar naming conventions or sequential numbering patterns. It ensures that security analysts do not waste resources investigating phantom threats and allows database maintainers to preserve the chronological sequence of assigned IDs without creating gaps or duplicates in historical records. For incident response teams, this means no forensic investigation is required, as there are no artifacts, indicators of compromise, or attack vectors associated with this specific reference point within global security information systems.