CVE-2026-62135 in Booktics Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 09/11/2026
Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Booktics <= 1.0.24 versions.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/11/2026
The vulnerability identified as an unbroken access control issue within Booktics versions up to and including 1.0.24 represents a critical failure in the application's security architecture, specifically concerning authentication mechanisms. This flaw allows attackers who have not authenticated themselves to interact with protected endpoints or perform actions that should be restricted to authorized users only. In modern web applications, access control is typically enforced through session management tokens, cookies, or other credentials that verify user identity and permissions before processing requests. The absence of these checks in specific areas of the Booktics application creates a significant security gap where any individual on the network can manipulate data or execute administrative functions without valid login credentials.
From a technical perspective, this vulnerability aligns with CWE-284, which describes Improper Access Control, and more specifically falls under the category of Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Data when sensitive information is exposed, or CWE-639 if it involves unauthorized escalation of privileges. The root cause likely stems from insufficient server-side validation of incoming requests. Instead of verifying that a user has an active session with appropriate permissions before processing actions such as creating, updating, or deleting records within the book management system, the application accepts and executes these commands based solely on the request structure itself. This oversight means that API endpoints or internal routes designed for administrative tasks are exposed to public access, bypassing the intended security boundaries established by the developers.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe due to its potential for data manipulation and integrity compromise. An attacker can exploit this flaw to inject malicious content into the book database, alter existing entries such as titles or authors, or even delete critical records entirely. This leads directly to a loss of data integrity, which is one of the core pillars of information security alongside confidentiality and availability. Furthermore, if the application stores user-specific metadata or relies on these unauthenticated actions for business logic workflows, it could lead to broader systemic failures. In some configurations, such access control flaws can serve as an entry point for further attacks, including SQL injection or cross-site scripting, by allowing attackers to inject malicious payloads into fields that are then rendered without proper sanitization in subsequent views.
This type of vulnerability is also frequently associated with the MITRE ATT&CK technique T1078, Valid Accounts, although in this specific case, it represents a bypass where no valid account is required at all, effectively rendering authentication controls obsolete for certain functions. Attackers can automate exploitation using standard web scraping tools or custom scripts to rapidly modify large volumes of data, causing significant disruption to the service's reliability and trustworthiness. For organizations relying on Booktics for library management or book tracking, this could result in substantial reputational damage and loss of user confidence if corrupted data becomes visible to end-users.
To mitigate this vulnerability, immediate action is required by upgrading the application to a version later than 1.0.24 where these access control checks have been properly implemented. If an upgrade is not immediately feasible, administrators should implement network-level controls such as firewall rules or reverse proxy configurations that restrict access to sensitive endpoints only from trusted IP addresses or internal networks until a patch can be applied. Additionally, implementing robust input validation and output encoding on all server-side handlers can help reduce the risk of secondary exploitation vectors like SQL injection that may arise from this initial breach in access control. Regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on authentication bypasses are recommended to ensure that similar gaps do not exist elsewhere in the application logic.