CVE-2026-70215 in Officeinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 10/14/2026

Use after free in Microsoft Office PowerPoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 10/14/2026

The vulnerability described constitutes a critical security flaw within the Microsoft Office PowerPoint application, specifically involving a use-after-free condition that can be exploited remotely by an unauthorized attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution. This type of defect is fundamentally rooted in improper memory management practices where software continues to utilize a pointer after the memory it references has been freed or reallocated. In the context of modern operating systems and application architectures, such as those powering Microsoft Office, memory safety is paramount for maintaining system integrity. When an attacker crafts a malicious PowerPoint file containing specially designed objects or embedded content, they can trigger this flaw during the parsing or rendering process. The sequence typically involves allocating a block of memory to store data associated with a presentation element, subsequently freeing that memory when it is no longer needed by the application logic, but failing to nullify the pointer or update references to it.

Once the original memory region has been deallocated, it may be reused by other parts of the system for different purposes. If the vulnerable component in PowerPoint retains a reference to this now-invalid address and attempts to read from or write to it, undefined behavior occurs. An attacker can exploit this race condition or logic error by carefully controlling what data is placed into that freed memory region before the application accesses it again. By injecting malicious shellcode or other executable payloads into the reclaimed memory space through a crafted file structure, the attacker ensures that when PowerPoint attempts to access the stale pointer, it inadvertently executes their code instead of legitimate program instructions. This mechanism bypasses many standard security controls because the execution originates from within the trusted context of the Office application itself, which often possesses higher privileges than untrusted network inputs would normally allow.

The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe due to its remote exploitability over a network. Since PowerPoint files are frequently shared via email attachments, cloud storage links, or instant messaging platforms, an attacker does not need physical access or prior authentication on the target system. A successful exploitation allows full control over the affected machine, enabling the installation of malware, theft of sensitive data, creation of backdoors for persistent access, and lateral movement within a corporate network. This aligns with common attack patterns observed in advanced persistent threat campaigns where initial access is gained through social engineering tactics targeting users to open malicious documents. The ability to execute code remotely makes this vulnerability particularly dangerous as it can be automated at scale against organizations that rely heavily on collaborative document editing and sharing.

From a classification perspective, this issue maps directly to CWE-416, Use After Free, which describes the error of using memory after it has been freed. It also relates closely to CWE-94, Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection), as the ultimate goal is code execution via injected payloads. In terms of adversary tactics and techniques, this vulnerability facilitates Initial Access through T1566.001, Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment, where malicious files are used to deliver exploits. Once executed, it enables Execution via T1204.002, User Execution, leading potentially to Command and Control activities if the exploited code establishes a connection back to an attacker-controlled server. Mitigation strategies must focus on both technical controls and user awareness. Organizations should ensure that Microsoft Office applications are updated with the latest security patches released by Microsoft to address these memory management flaws. Additionally, implementing application whitelisting can prevent unauthorized scripts or executables from running even if they are delivered via such exploits. Network segmentation limits lateral movement, while email gateway solutions equipped with sandboxing capabilities can detect and block malicious documents before they reach end-user devices. User training remains critical, emphasizing caution when opening files from untrusted sources to reduce the likelihood of successful initial exploitation.

Responsible

Microsoft

Reservation

08/04/2026

Disclosure

10/14/2026

Moderation

accepted

EPSS

0.00798

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!