CVE-2026-81269 in Drupal
Summary
by MITRE • 09/02/2026
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Data field allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Data field versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.13.
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/02/2026
The identified security flaw resides within the Drupal Data module, specifically affecting version ranges from 0.0.0 through 2.0.13. This vulnerability is classified as a Missing Authorization issue that facilitates Forceful Browsing, allowing unauthorized users to access sensitive data fields or administrative functionalities without proper permission checks. In web application architecture, authorization mechanisms are critical for ensuring that only authenticated and privileged users can perform specific actions or view certain resources. When these controls are absent or improperly implemented within the Data module's API endpoints or field handlers, it creates a direct pathway for attackers to enumerate and retrieve data that should be restricted based on user roles or permissions.
From a technical perspective, this vulnerability stems from an insufficient access control check in the code handling requests related to data fields. The application fails to verify whether the requesting user has the necessary privileges before processing the request or returning field values. This oversight allows attackers to craft direct HTTP requests targeting internal endpoints associated with the Data module. By manipulating parameters such as entity IDs, bundle names, or field identifiers, an attacker can bypass standard interface restrictions and extract structured data directly from the database layer via exposed API routes. The absence of server-side validation for user session tokens or role-based access control lists enables this unauthorized traversal of protected resources.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is significant, particularly in environments where sensitive information such as personally identifiable information (PII), financial records, or proprietary business data is stored within Drupal fields. An attacker leveraging this flaw can conduct systematic enumeration to map out the structure and content of the database. This capability not only leads to a direct breach of confidentiality but also serves as an initial foothold for further exploitation. The extracted data may reveal internal configurations, user credentials hashes if improperly handled elsewhere, or other contextual information that aids in more advanced attacks such as social engineering or targeted privilege escalation within the broader application ecosystem.
This vulnerability aligns with CWE-284, which describes Improper Access Control, and specifically relates to CWE-639 regarding Authorization Bypass through Forceful Browsing. In terms of offensive security frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, this behavior corresponds to techniques under the Discovery phase, particularly T1078 Valid Accounts if combined with credential theft or T1505 Server Software Component Abuse when exploiting module-specific endpoints. The lack of proper authorization checks represents a fundamental failure in implementing defense-in-depth strategies for web applications built on content management systems.
To mitigate this risk, organizations running Drupal installations must immediately upgrade the Data module to version 2.0.14 or later, where these access control mechanisms have been corrected and validated by security researchers. Until an update is applied, administrators should implement compensating controls such as Web Application Firewall rules that restrict direct access to known vulnerable endpoints associated with the data field API. Additionally, enforcing strict role-based permissions within Drupal’s core configuration can help limit exposure, although this is not a substitute for patching the underlying code defect. Regular security audits and penetration testing focused on authorization logic are recommended to identify similar gaps in other modules or custom implementations that may share the same architectural weaknesses.