CVE-2026-85429 in MOOS-IvP
Summary
by MITRE • 09/04/2026
MOOS-IvP uFldNodeComms through 24.8.1 trusts the source node identity from the message body rather than validating it from the connection source. Attackers can craft NODE_MESSAGE packets with spoofed source identities to impersonate other nodes and post arbitrary variable notifications without validation.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/05/2026
The vulnerability in MOOS-IvP versions through 24.8.1 stems from a fundamental flaw in how node identity is authenticated within the communication protocol, specifically affecting the uFldNodeComms component. In secure distributed systems, particularly those involving autonomous underwater vehicles or other multi-agent robotic platforms relying on MOOS (Mission Oriented Operating Suite), trust boundaries must be strictly enforced at every layer of interaction. The core technical flaw lies in the application's reliance on trusting the source node identity embedded directly within the message body rather than validating this identity against the actual network connection source, such as the IP address and port from which the packet originated. This design decision creates a significant authentication bypass mechanism because it assumes that any entity capable of sending a UDP or TCP packet to the MOOS middleware is inherently authorized to claim whatever identity they wish within the payload. By decoupling logical identity from physical transport layer attributes, the system fails to implement proper origin validation, allowing malicious actors to inject forged messages into the shared behavioral blackboard without detection.
From an operational perspective, this lack of source verification enables attackers to perform node impersonation attacks with severe consequences for mission integrity and safety. An adversary who gains access to the local network segment hosting the MOOS-IvP deployment can craft NODE_MESSAGE packets containing spoofed source identities that mimic legitimate nodes within the swarm or control system. Once these forged messages are accepted by the middleware, they trigger arbitrary variable notifications across the entire distributed environment. This capability allows an attacker to inject false sensor data, issue unauthorized command overrides, or disrupt critical state variables that other autonomous agents rely upon for decision-making processes. The impact is not limited to simple denial of service; it extends to active manipulation of system behavior, potentially leading to collision risks, mission failure, or physical damage to the hardware involved if the spoofed commands are executed by downstream actuators or control algorithms.
This vulnerability aligns closely with CWE-287 Improper Authentication and CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity as defined in common weakness enumerations. The attack vector is classified under MITRE ATT&CK technique T1098, specifically Account Manipulation via SSH Authorized Keys or similar identity spoofing mechanisms where an attacker alters the perceived identity to gain unauthorized access or influence system state. In the context of cyber-physical systems, this represents a critical failure in supply chain and operational security because it undermines the integrity of the command-and-control loop. The absence of mutual authentication means that any node on the network can masquerade as a trusted peer, effectively breaking the trust model required for safe autonomous operation.
Mitigation strategies must focus on implementing robust cryptographic verification mechanisms to ensure message authenticity and origin validation. Ideally, MOOS-IvP should be updated to enforce strict source IP binding where the identity claimed in the message body is cryptographically signed using asymmetric keys associated with that specific node's network address. Alternatively, if signature-based authentication is not immediately feasible for legacy deployments, implementing access control lists based on trusted IP ranges and validating that the declared sender matches the socket connection details can reduce exposure. Organizations relying on these systems should also consider isolating MOOS-IvP networks from untrusted zones using firewalls or VLANs to limit the attack surface until a permanent patch is deployed. Regular security audits focusing on identity management in distributed robotics frameworks are essential to prevent similar architectural flaws in future iterations of autonomous software stacks.