CVE-2026-96549 in hosp_order
Summary
by MITRE • 09/23/2026
A vulnerability has been found in sfturing hosp_order up to 627f426331da8086ce8fff2017d65b1ddef384f8. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file ssm_pro/src/main/java/cn/sfturing/service/impl/CommonUserServiceImpl.java. Such manipulation leads to cleartext storage of sensitive information. The attack can only be performed from a local environment. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/23/2026
The identified vulnerability resides within the sfturing hosp_order component, specifically affecting the CommonUserServiceImpl class located in the ssm_pro source directory. This flaw is characterized by a critical failure in data handling practices that results in the cleartext storage of sensitive information. In secure software development, particularly when dealing with user-related services such as those found in healthcare or hospital ordering systems, it is imperative that any personally identifiable information (PII), authentication credentials, or other confidential data be encrypted both at rest and during transmission. The presence of this vulnerability indicates a significant lapse in the application's security architecture, where sensitive fields are persisted to storage mechanisms without adequate cryptographic protection. This misalignment with established secure coding standards exposes the system to severe risks should an attacker gain access to the underlying file systems or database stores.
From a technical perspective, this issue aligns closely with CWE-312, which defines Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information. The flaw suggests that the implementation within CommonUserServiceImpl.java fails to apply encryption algorithms such as AES or RSA before writing data to persistent storage. Instead, plaintext values are written directly, making them readable by any process or user with read permissions on the storage medium. This is a common oversight in legacy codebases or projects undergoing rapid development cycles where security reviews may be deprioritized. The vulnerability allows for the direct exfiltration of sensitive data if an attacker can access the local environment where the application runs, whether through privilege escalation, insider threats, or compromised server environments.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is substantial, particularly given the context of hospital ordering systems which handle highly regulated health information. Under frameworks such as HIPAA in the United States or GDPR in Europe, storing sensitive patient data in cleartext constitutes a major compliance violation and can lead to severe legal penalties, reputational damage, and loss of trust among stakeholders. Furthermore, because the exploit is disclosed publicly and usable from a local environment, it lowers the barrier for entry significantly. Local attackers with even minimal access privileges could potentially dump database files or configuration storage containing unencrypted sensitive data. This scenario maps to several MITRE ATT&CK techniques, including T1005 (Data from Local System) and potentially T1539 (Steal Web Session Cookie) if session tokens are also stored insecurely. The ability of the exploit to be used by external parties once local access is gained amplifies the risk profile considerably.
The project's development model, which utilizes rolling releases for continuous delivery, complicates traditional vulnerability management strategies that rely on specific version numbers for patching and mitigation tracking. Without discrete version tags distinguishing affected from updated releases, administrators cannot easily determine if their current deployment contains the fix or remains vulnerable to this cleartext storage flaw. This lack of clear version delineation hinders automated security scanning tools and manual audit processes that depend on precise version matching against known vulnerability databases. Consequently, organizations relying on this software must perform deep code analysis or rely on behavioral monitoring rather than simple version checks to assess their exposure status.
Mitigation strategies for this issue require immediate attention from the development team responsible for sfturing hosp_order. The primary remediation step is to implement robust encryption mechanisms for all sensitive data fields before they are persisted. This includes using industry-standard algorithms like AES-256 with appropriate key management practices, ensuring that keys themselves are not stored alongside the encrypted data in a manner that allows trivial decryption. Additionally, developers should conduct a comprehensive audit of the CommonUserServiceImpl class and related modules to identify any other instances where sensitive information might be exposed through logging, error messages, or database storage. Until an official patch is released by the project maintainers, organizations running this software should consider isolating the affected services within restricted network segments, enforcing strict file system permissions to limit local access, and implementing intrusion detection systems that monitor for unusual data exfiltration patterns indicative of cleartext retrieval attacks.