NetIQ Access Manager up to 4.2.2/4.3.0 Identity Server samlp:AuthnRequest Document cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in NetIQ Access Manager up to 4.2.2/4.3.0. This affects an unknown function of the component Identity Server. This manipulation as part of samlp:AuthnRequest Document causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2017-5183. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in NetIQ Access Manager up to 4.2.2/4.3.0 (Access Management Software). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the component Identity Server. The manipulation as part of a samlp:AuthnRequest Document leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
NetIQ Access Manager 4.2.2 and 4.3.x before 4.3.1+, when configured as an Identity Server, has XSS in the AssertionConsumerServiceURL field of a signed AuthnRequest in a samlp:AuthnRequest document.
The bug was discovered 04/13/2017. The weakness was published 04/20/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at novell.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-5183 since 01/06/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 7 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 4.3.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
Similar entry is available at VDB-100406. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Access Manager 4.3.1
Timeline
01/06/2017 🔍04/13/2017 🔍
04/20/2017 🔍
04/20/2017 🔍
04/21/2017 🔍
09/19/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: microfocus.comAdvisory: novell.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-5183 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-5183
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-100405
OSVDB: - CVE-2017-5183 - NetIQ - Access Manager - Cross-Site Scripting Issue
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/21/2017 10:12Updated: 09/19/2020 09:36
Changes: 04/21/2017 10:12 (61), 09/19/2020 09:36 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.