VDB-10067 · ID 7977 · OSVDB 96556

NOD32 prior 6.0.316.0 Local Privilege Escalation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.1$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in NOD32. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to an unknown weakness. No exploit exists. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in NOD32 and classified as problematic. The impact remains unknown.

The weakness was disclosed 02/06/2013 by Gynvael Coldwind and Felix Groebert with Google Security Team as 7977 as not defined release notes (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at virusradar.com. The public release has been coordinated in cooperation with the project team. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

Upgrading to version 6.0.316.0 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at OSVDB (96556†). The entries VDB-10071, VDB-10070, VDB-10069 and VDB-10068 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Name

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Local Privilege Escalation
CWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Upgrade: NOD32 6.0.316.0

Timelineinfo

02/06/2013 🔍
02/06/2013 +0 days 🔍
09/02/2013 +208 days 🔍
09/02/2013 +0 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: 7977
Researcher: Gynvael Coldwind, Felix Groebert
Organization: Google Security Team
Status: Not defined
Coordinated: 🔍

GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-10067
OSVDB: 96556

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 09/02/2013 16:22
Changes: 09/02/2013 16:22 (43)
Complete: 🔍
Committer: olku
Cache ID: 216:FEC:103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!