| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Cybozu Office up to 10.5.0 and classified as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in access control. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2017-2115. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Cybozu Office up to 10.5.0 (Office Suite Software). This affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-284. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Cybozu Office 10.0.0 to 10.5.0 allows remote authenticated attackers to bypass access restriction to obtain "customapp" information via unspecified vectors.
The bug was discovered 04/11/2017. The weakness was disclosed 04/28/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-2115 since 12/01/2016. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. A authentication is necessary for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 17 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 97717†). The entries VDB-100676 and VDB-100678 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://cybozu-global.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
OpenVAS ID: 801056
OpenVAS Name: Cybozu Office Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/01/2016 🔍04/11/2017 🔍
04/18/2017 🔍
04/28/2017 🔍
04/28/2017 🔍
04/28/2017 🔍
12/22/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cybozu-global.comAdvisory: jvn.jp
Researcher: Cybozu, Kazuto Sagamihara.
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-2115 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-2115
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-100677
SecurityFocus: 97717 - Cybozu Office Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: - CVE-2017-2115 - Cybozu Office - Security Bypass Issue
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/28/2017 23:49Updated: 12/22/2020 07:09
Changes: 04/28/2017 23:49 (64), 09/22/2020 08:03 (4), 12/22/2020 07:09 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.