| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in BaserCMS up to 3.0.10. It has been classified as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Plugin Blog. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2016-4881. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in BaserCMS up to 3.0.10 (Content Management System). It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code block of the component Plugin Blog. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Blog version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors.
The bug was discovered 09/29/2016. The weakness was released 05/12/2017 by Shoji Baba with Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2016-4881 since 05/17/2016. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 225 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 93217†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-101136, VDB-101137, VDB-101138 and VDB-101139. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/17/2016 🔍09/29/2016 🔍
09/29/2016 🔍
05/12/2017 🔍
05/12/2017 🔍
05/13/2017 🔍
09/25/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpResearcher: Shoji Baba
Organization: Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc.
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-4881 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-4881
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-101141
SecurityFocus: 93217 - baserCMS Multiple HTML Injection and Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-4881 - Basercms - Basercms - Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/13/2017 08:55Updated: 09/25/2020 20:19
Changes: 05/13/2017 08:55 (60), 09/25/2020 20:19 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.