| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in HPE Aruba ClearPass. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting (Reflected). This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-5827. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in HPE Aruba ClearPass (unknown version). This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Reflected). CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A reflected cross site scripting vulnerability in HPE Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager version 6.6.x was found.
The bug was discovered 05/25/2017. The weakness was published 05/25/2017 as HPESBHF03730 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at h20564.www2.hpe.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-5827. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The requirement for exploitation is a authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 98722†). Further details are available at seclists.org. Similar entries are available at VDB-99568, VDB-101922, VDB-101923 and VDB-101924. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.hpe.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Vendor Base Score (HPE): 4.6
Vendor Vector (HPE): 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Vendor Base Score (HPE): 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ReflectedClass: Cross site scripting / Reflected
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/01/2017 🔍05/24/2017 🔍
05/25/2017 🔍
05/25/2017 🔍
05/25/2017 🔍
06/04/2017 🔍
02/15/2018 🔍
12/26/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: hpe.comAdvisory: HPESBHF03730
Researcher: Luke Young
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-5827 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-5827
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-101925
SecurityFocus: 98722 - ClearPass Policy Manager Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
Misc.: 🔍
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/04/2017 10:23Updated: 12/26/2020 09:09
Changes: 06/04/2017 10:23 (77), 10/13/2019 13:00 (5), 12/26/2020 09:09 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:485:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.