Lenovo Service Bridge up to 3 DHCP cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Lenovo Service Bridge up to 3. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component DHCP Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2016-8229. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Lenovo Service Bridge up to 3. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component DHCP Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Lenovo Service Bridge before version 4 could be exploited by an attacker with access to the DHCP server used by the system where LSB is installed.
The bug was discovered 05/12/2017. The weakness was presented 06/04/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at support.lenovo.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2016-8229. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 23 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 4 eliminates this vulnerability.
See VDB-101932, VDB-101934 and VDB-101935 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.lenovo.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Service Bridge 4
Timeline
09/16/2016 🔍05/12/2017 🔍
06/04/2017 🔍
06/04/2017 🔍
06/05/2017 🔍
10/13/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: lenovo.comAdvisory: support.lenovo.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-8229 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-8229
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-101933
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/05/2017 09:38Updated: 10/13/2019 15:13
Changes: 06/05/2017 09:38 (59), 10/13/2019 15:13 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:9C5:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.