Personify360 E-Business up to 7.6.1 /TabId/275 Table improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Personify360 E-Business up to 7.6.1. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /TabId/275. This manipulation causes improper authentication (Table). This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2017-7314. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Personify360 E-Business up to 7.6.1 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the file /TabId/275. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability (Table). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in Personify360 e-Business 7.5.2 through 7.6.1. When going to the /TabId/275 URI, while creating a new role, a list of database tables and their columns is available.
The bug was discovered 06/06/2017. The weakness was disclosed 06/07/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at amswoes.wordpress.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-7314 since 03/29/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (41986). The entries VDB-102036 and VDB-102035 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: TableClass: Improper authentication / Table
CWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/29/2017 🔍06/06/2017 🔍
06/07/2017 🔍
06/07/2017 🔍
06/07/2017 🔍
06/23/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: amswoes.wordpress.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-7314 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-7314
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-102037
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/07/2017 19:49Updated: 06/23/2024 02:15
Changes: 06/07/2017 19:49 (59), 10/14/2019 10:19 (4), 06/23/2024 02:15 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.