I-O DATA DEVICE TS-WRLP/TS-WRLA up to 1.01.02 os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in I-O DATA DEVICE TS-WRLP and TS-WRLA up to 1.01.02. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes os command injection. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2016-7819. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in I-O DATA DEVICE TS-WRLP and TS-WRLA up to 1.01.02 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
I-O DATA DEVICE TS-WRLP firmware version 1.01.02 and earlier and TS-WRLA firmware version 1.01.02 and earlier allows an attacker with administrator rights to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors.
The bug was discovered 11/30/2016. The weakness was released 06/09/2017 with Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2016-7819 since 09/09/2016. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. A single authentication is required for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 191 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 94594†). Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-102182. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.1
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.2
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/09/2016 🔍11/30/2016 🔍
11/30/2016 🔍
06/09/2017 🔍
06/09/2017 🔍
06/10/2017 🔍
12/26/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpResearcher: Taizoh Tsukamoto
Organization: Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc.
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-7819 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-7819
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-102181
SecurityFocus: 94594 - Multiple I-O DATA DEVICE Products Buffer Overflow and Command Injection Vulnerabilities
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/10/2017 08:52Updated: 12/26/2020 18:37
Changes: 06/10/2017 08:52 (59), 10/15/2019 17:40 (4), 12/26/2020 18:37 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.