IBM BigFix Compliance Account Lockout credentials management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in IBM BigFix Compliance. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component Account Lockout. Performing a manipulation results in credentials management. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-1197. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in IBM BigFix Compliance (Endpoint Management Software) (unknown version). This affects an unknown code block of the component Account Lockout. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a credentials management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-255. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
IBM BigFix Compliance (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 123672.
The bug was discovered 06/06/2017. The weakness was published 06/15/2017 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at ibm.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-1197 since 11/30/2016. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1552 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 100720 (IBM BigFix Compliance 1.9.70 Multiple Vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Misc. and running in the context r.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published before and not just after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (100720) and SecurityFocus (BID 98909†). Similar entries are available at VDB-102058, VDB-102059 and VDB-102151. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Credentials managementCWE: CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 100720
Nessus Name: IBM BigFix Compliance 1.9.70 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/30/2016 🔍05/24/2017 🔍
06/06/2017 🔍
06/06/2017 🔍
06/09/2017 🔍
06/15/2017 🔍
06/15/2017 🔍
06/15/2017 🔍
12/28/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: ibm.com
Researcher: IBM
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-1197 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-1197
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-102555
X-Force: 123672
SecurityFocus: 98909
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/15/2017 18:50Updated: 12/28/2020 20:25
Changes: 06/15/2017 18:50 (65), 10/25/2019 14:34 (5), 12/28/2020 20:18 (3), 12/28/2020 20:25 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.