Algonquin State Bank Mobile Banking App 3.0.0 on iOS X.509 Certificate Crafted Certificate certificate validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Algonquin State Bank Mobile Banking App 3.0.0 on iOS. It has been classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component X.509 Certificate. Performing a manipulation as part of Crafted Certificate results in certificate validation. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2017-9581. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Algonquin State Bank Mobile Banking App 3.0.0 on iOS (Banking Software). It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown code block of the component X.509 Certificate. The manipulation as part of a Crafted Certificate leads to a certificate validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-295. The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The "Algonquin State Bank Mobile Banking" by Algonquin State Bank app 3.0.0 -- aka algonquin-state-bank-mobile-banking/id1089657735 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
The bug was discovered 06/15/2017. The weakness was disclosed 06/16/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at medium.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-9581 since 06/12/2017. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1587.003 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-102574, VDB-102575, VDB-102576 and VDB-102577 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.9
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate validationCWE: CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/12/2017 🔍06/15/2017 🔍
06/16/2017 🔍
06/16/2017 🔍
06/16/2017 🔍
10/18/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: medium.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-9581 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-9581
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-102597
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/16/2017 21:14Updated: 10/18/2019 16:16
Changes: 06/16/2017 21:14 (60), 10/18/2019 16:16 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.