Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. Mobile Banking App 3.0.1 on iOS X.509 Certificate Crafted Certificate certificate validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. Mobile Banking App 3.0.1 on iOS. It has been rated as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the component X.509 Certificate. This manipulation as part of Crafted Certificate causes certificate validation. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2017-9597. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. Mobile Banking App 3.0.1 on iOS (Banking Software) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component X.509 Certificate. The manipulation as part of a Crafted Certificate leads to a certificate validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-295. The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The "Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. Mobile Banking" by Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. app 3.0.1 -- aka blue-ridge-bank-and-trust-co-mobile-banking/id699679197 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
The bug was discovered 06/15/2017. The weakness was presented 06/16/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at medium.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-9597 since 06/12/2017. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1587.003 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-102574, VDB-102575, VDB-102576 and VDB-102577 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Base Score: 5.6
VulDB Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.9
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate validationCWE: CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/12/2017 🔍06/15/2017 🔍
06/16/2017 🔍
06/16/2017 🔍
06/16/2017 🔍
10/18/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: medium.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-9597 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-9597
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-102613
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/16/2017 21:18Updated: 10/18/2019 14:44
Changes: 06/16/2017 21:18 (60), 10/18/2019 14:44 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.