MaLion up to 5.2.1 on Windows/Mac improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in MaLion up to 5.2.1 on Windows/Mac. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to improper authentication. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2017-10815. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in MaLion up to 5.2.1 on Windows/Mac. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
MaLion for Windows 5.2.1 and earlier (only when "Remote Control" is installed) and MaLion for Mac 4.0.1 to 5.2.1 (only when "Remote Control" is installed) allows remote attackers to bypass authentication to executue arbitrary commands or operations on Terminal Agent.
The bug was discovered 08/01/2017. The weakness was presented 08/04/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at intercom.co.jp. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-10815 since 07/04/2017. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 3 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-104814, VDB-104815, VDB-104816 and VDB-104817 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.7
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/04/2017 🔍08/01/2017 🔍
08/04/2017 🔍
08/04/2017 🔍
08/05/2017 🔍
11/03/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: intercom.co.jpStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-10815 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-10815
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-104813
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/05/2017 20:07Updated: 11/03/2019 15:18
Changes: 08/05/2017 20:07 (57), 11/03/2019 15:18 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.