IBM Sametime Media Server up to 9.0.1 information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in IBM Sametime Media Server 8.5.2/8.5.2.1/9.0/9.0.0.1/9.0.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in information disclosure. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2016-2970. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in IBM Sametime Media Server 8.5.2/8.5.2.1/9.0/9.0.0.1/9.0.1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
IBM Sametime 8.5 and 9.0 meetings server may provide detailed information in an error message that may provide details about the application to possible attackers. IBM X-Force ID: 113851.
The bug was discovered 08/23/2017. The weakness was published 08/23/2017 as swg22006233 as confirmed security advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at www-01.ibm.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2016-2970 since 03/09/2016. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. A authentication is required for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 9.0.1 FP1 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 100529†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1039228†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Vendor Base Score (IBM): 4.3
Vendor Vector (IBM): 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Sametime Media Server 9.0.1 FP1
Timeline
03/09/2016 🔍08/23/2017 🔍
08/23/2017 🔍
08/23/2017 🔍
08/23/2017 🔍
08/25/2017 🔍
08/27/2017 🔍
08/28/2017 🔍
01/10/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: swg22006233
Researcher: IBM
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-2970 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-2970
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-105765
X-Force: 113851
SecurityFocus: 100529
SecurityTracker: 1039228
Entry
Created: 08/27/2017 19:53Updated: 01/10/2021 07:08
Changes: 08/27/2017 19:53 (68), 11/10/2019 15:04 (9), 01/10/2021 07:05 (2), 01/10/2021 07:08 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.