IBM Sametime Enterprise Meeting Server 8.5.2/9.0 Screen Sharing cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in IBM Sametime Enterprise Meeting Server 8.5.2/9.0 and classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component Screen Sharing. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2016-0355. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in IBM Sametime Enterprise Meeting Server 8.5.2/9.0. This affects an unknown part of the component Screen Sharing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
IBM Sametime Enterprise Meeting Server 8.5.2 and 9.0 could allow an authenticated user that has been invited to a Sametime meeting room, to cause the screen sharing to cease through the use of cross-site request forgery. IBM X-Force ID: 111894.
The bug was discovered 08/23/2017. The weakness was published 08/29/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at ibm.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2016-0355 since 12/08/2015. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. A authentication is necessary for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 6 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 100599†). Similar entries are available at VDB-105884, VDB-105886, VDB-105888 and VDB-105889. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/08/2015 🔍08/23/2017 🔍
08/23/2017 🔍
08/29/2017 🔍
08/29/2017 🔍
08/30/2017 🔍
01/10/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: ibm.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-0355 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-0355
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-105885
X-Force: 111894
SecurityFocus: 100599 - IBM Sametime Meetings Server Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
SecurityTracker: 1039231
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/30/2017 08:25Updated: 01/10/2021 08:22
Changes: 08/30/2017 08:25 (54), 11/11/2019 11:57 (10), 01/10/2021 08:22 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.