DocuWorks/DocuWorks Viewer Light up to 8.0.7 Installer Search Path untrusted search path
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in DocuWorks and DocuWorks Viewer Light up to 8.0.7. Affected is an unknown function of the component Installer. The manipulation as part of Search Path leads to untrusted search path. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2017-10848. The attack needs to be performed locally. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in DocuWorks and DocuWorks Viewer Light up to 8.0.7 and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code of the component Installer. The manipulation as part of a Search Path leads to a untrusted search path vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-426. The product searches for critical resources using an externally-supplied search path that can point to resources that are not under the product's direct control. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Installers for DocuWorks 8.0.7 and earlier and DocuWorks Viewer Light published in Jul 2017 and earlier allows an attacker to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in an unspecified directory.
The bug was discovered 08/31/2017. The weakness was released 09/01/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-10848 since 07/04/2017. An attack has to be approached locally. A simple authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1574 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-106062, VDB-106063 and VDB-106064. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Untrusted search pathCWE: CWE-426
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
OpenVAS ID: 800478
OpenVAS Name: DocuWorks Viewer Light Code Execution Vulnerability (Windows)
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/04/2017 🔍08/31/2017 🔍
09/01/2017 🔍
09/01/2017 🔍
09/02/2017 🔍
11/12/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-10848 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-10848
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-106061
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/02/2017 09:43Updated: 11/12/2019 15:46
Changes: 09/02/2017 09:43 (57), 11/12/2019 15:46 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.