Beijing Hanbang Hanbanggaoke PUT Request /ISAPI/Security/users/1 Password input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Beijing Hanbang Hanbanggaoke. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /ISAPI/Security/users/1 of the component PUT Request Handler. Performing a manipulation results in input validation (Password). This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2017-14335. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Beijing Hanbang Hanbanggaoke (affected version not known). This affects some unknown functionality of the file /ISAPI/Security/users/1 of the component PUT Request Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability (Password). CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
On Beijing Hanbang Hanbanggaoke devices, because user-controlled input is not sufficiently sanitized, sending a PUT request to /ISAPI/Security/users/1 allows an admin password change.
The bug was discovered 09/12/2017. The weakness was disclosed 09/12/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at blogs.securiteam.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-14335 since 09/12/2017. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a public exploit are known.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (44061). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: PasswordClass: Input validation / Password
CWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/12/2017 🔍09/12/2017 🔍
09/12/2017 🔍
09/12/2017 🔍
09/13/2017 🔍
09/12/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: blogs.securiteam.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-14335 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-14335
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-106437
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 09/13/2017 10:58Updated: 09/12/2024 15:08
Changes: 09/13/2017 10:58 (50), 11/15/2019 09:36 (11), 09/12/2024 15:08 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.