Vectura Perfect Privacy VPN Manager 1.10.10/1.10.11 input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Vectura Perfect Privacy VPN Manager 1.10.10/1.10.11. This impacts an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in input validation. This vulnerability was named CVE-2017-16637. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Vectura Perfect Privacy VPN Manager 1.10.10/1.10.11 (Network Encryption Software). This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
In Vectura Perfect Privacy VPN Manager v1.10.10 and v1.10.11, when resetting the network data via the software client, with a running VPN connection, a critical error occurs which leads to a "FrmAdvancedProtection" crash. Although the mechanism malfunctions and an error occurs during the runtime with the stack trace being issued, the software process is not properly terminated. The software client is still attempting to maintain the connection even though the network connection information is being reset live. In that insecure mode, the "FrmAdvancedProtection" component crashes, but the process continues to run with different errors and process corruptions. This local corruption vulnerability can be exploited by local attackers.
The bug was discovered 11/06/2017. The weakness was presented 11/06/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at board.perfect-privacy.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-16637 since 11/06/2017. An attack has to be approached locally. The successful exploitation needs a authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.8
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/06/2017 🔍11/06/2017 🔍
11/06/2017 🔍
11/06/2017 🔍
11/07/2017 🔍
12/04/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: board.perfect-privacy.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-16637 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-16637
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-109173
Entry
Created: 11/07/2017 08:06Updated: 12/04/2019 19:20
Changes: 11/07/2017 08:06 (56), 12/04/2019 19:20 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.