Apache Sling up to 1.4.0 Authentication Service Credentials information disclosure

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Apache Sling up to 1.4.0. It has been rated as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the component Authentication Service. The manipulation leads to information disclosure (Credentials). This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2017-15700. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Apache Sling up to 1.4.0. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown function of the component Authentication Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability (Credentials). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
A flaw in the org.apache.sling.auth.core.AuthUtil#isRedirectValid method in Apache Sling Authentication Service 1.4.0 allows an attacker, through the Sling login form, to trick a victim to send over their credentials.
The bug was discovered 12/18/2017. The weakness was shared 12/18/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at lists.apache.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-15700 since 10/21/2017. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/15/2019). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 11896 (Apache Sling Authentication Service Vulnerability).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.apache.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: CredentialsClass: Information disclosure / Credentials
CWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/21/2017 🔍12/18/2017 🔍
12/18/2017 🔍
12/18/2017 🔍
12/19/2017 🔍
12/15/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: apache.orgAdvisory: lists.apache.org
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-15700 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-15700
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-110789
Entry
Created: 12/19/2017 08:05Updated: 12/15/2019 22:02
Changes: 12/19/2017 08:05 (59), 12/15/2019 22:02 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.