Ability Mail Server 3.3.2 /_readmail Message cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability categorized as problematic has been discovered in Ability Mail Server 3.3.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /_readmail. Such manipulation as part of Message leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2017-17752. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Ability Mail Server 3.3.2 (Mail Server Software) and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is an unknown functionality of the file /_readmail. The manipulation as part of a Message leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. CVE summarizes:
Ability Mail Server 3.3.2 has Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the body of an e-mail message, with JavaScript code executed on the Read Mail screen (aka the /_readmail URI). This is fixed in version 4.2.4.
The bug was discovered 12/20/2017. The weakness was published 12/20/2017 as EDB-ID 43378 as not defined exploit (Exploit-DB). The advisory is available at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2017-17752 since 12/19/2017. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known. This vulnerability is assigned to T1059.007 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (43378). seclists.org is providing further details. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/19/2017 🔍12/20/2017 🔍
12/20/2017 🔍
12/20/2017 🔍
12/20/2017 🔍
12/20/2017 🔍
12/21/2017 🔍
06/29/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: EDB-ID 43378Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-17752 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-17752
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-110930
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Misc.: 🔍
Entry
Created: 12/21/2017 08:45Updated: 06/29/2025 16:27
Changes: 12/21/2017 08:45 (65), 12/17/2019 16:53 (1), 06/29/2025 16:27 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:489:103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.