Huawei FusionSphere OpenStack V100R006C000SPC102 Transmission Protocol information disclosure

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Huawei FusionSphere OpenStack V100R006C000SPC102. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Transmission Protocol Handler. This manipulation causes information disclosure. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2017-15321. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Huawei FusionSphere OpenStack V100R006C000SPC102 (Cloud Software). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the component Transmission Protocol Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Huawei FusionSphere OpenStack V100R006C000SPC102 (NFV) has an information leak vulnerability due to the use of a low version transmission protocol by default. An attacker could intercept packets transferred by a target device. Successful exploit could cause an information leak.
The bug was discovered 11/10/2017. The weakness was presented 12/22/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at huawei.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-15321 since 10/14/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/18/2023). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 42 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.huawei.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.7
VulDB Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 3.7
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/14/2017 🔍11/10/2017 🔍
12/22/2017 🔍
12/22/2017 🔍
12/23/2017 🔍
01/18/2023 🔍
Sources
Vendor: huawei.comAdvisory: sa-20171108-01
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-15321 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-15321
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-111013
Entry
Created: 12/23/2017 09:44Updated: 01/18/2023 20:38
Changes: 12/23/2017 09:44 (57), 12/17/2019 15:26 (2), 01/18/2023 20:38 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.