backup-agoddard Gem/backup_checksum Gem on Ruby OpenSSL Command Line utility.rb Process information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in backup-agoddard Gem and backup_checksum Gem on Ruby. It has been rated as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code in the library lib/backup/cli/utility.rb of the component OpenSSL Command Line. The manipulation leads to information disclosure (Process). This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2014-4993. Local access is required to approach this attack. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in backup-agoddard Gem and backup_checksum Gem on Ruby (Backup Software) (version unknown) and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown function in the library lib/backup/cli/utility.rb of the component OpenSSL Command Line. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability (Process). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
(1) lib/backup/cli/utility.rb in the backup-agoddard gem 3.0.28 and (2) lib/backup/cli/utility.rb in the backup_checksum gem 3.0.23 for Ruby place credentials on the openssl command line, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by listing the process.
The bug was discovered 07/07/2014. The weakness was disclosed 01/10/2018 (oss-sec). It is possible to read the advisory at openwall.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2014-4993 since 07/17/2014. Attacking locally is a requirement. The successful exploitation requires a simple authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1592 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1283 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ProcessClass: Information disclosure / Process
CWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/07/2014 🔍07/17/2014 🔍
01/10/2018 🔍
01/10/2018 🔍
01/11/2018 🔍
12/21/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: openwall.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2014-4993 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-4993
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-111587
Entry
Created: 01/11/2018 08:01Updated: 12/21/2019 08:08
Changes: 01/11/2018 08:01 (58), 12/21/2019 08:08 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.